April 2021
The Political Pandemic : 2
None Dare Call It Conspiracy
"We talk about it as the ‘Covid-19 crisis’. It’s not. It’s a specific political crisis... Because... [historically], this virus is rather small in scale. It's gigantic in consequences because we have chosen to inflict a form of economic suicide on ourselves." |
- David Starkey, British historian, May 2020 |
To picture the self-inflicted nature of the Covid catastrophe, simply replay March 2020 in your mind's eye. There, with the benefit of hindsight, you will not only re-visualise but perceive more readily the contrived and controlled chaos set in train as politicians, technocrats and corporate media presstitutes pull out their Ipads, pull up the transcript of Event 201 — the pandemic simulation held on the very eve of the 'crisis' — and begin "flooding the zone" with "the narrative" — on cue, in unison, as scripted.
SUDDENLY: Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. Fearful dystopian terms like "lockdown," "self-isolation," "new normal," "Great Reset" assail the senses; nations and cities close up; citizens are locked in; "the house of prayer" [Lk 19:46] is shuttered; the sacraments suspended; government monitoring ratchets up; brutal police crackdowns ensue; economies freeze; stockmarkets plunge; unemployment skyrockets; supermarkets empty; executive power and control burgeon...
For the minority who refuse to park their brains permanently in neutral, these sci-fi scenes of scripted homogeneity immediately recalled 11 September 2001; the "catastrophic and catalysing event" Zionist Neocons had publicly touted in September 2000 as the only means of accelerating their deathly agenda of "regime change" throughout the Middle East.(1) Precisely twelve months later, that lone "event" did indeed catalyse globalist goals through a studiously undefined "war on terror" that ushered in a state of "permanent emergency"; extreme executive powers; the Homeland Security monolith; mass surveillance beyond Stalin's wildest dreams; the relentless WMD scam; and the carnage of U.S. wars.
What an amazingcoincidence it all was!
Almost as coincidental as the "table-top" simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic organised by Bill Gates and held in October 2019, just as Covid began circulating. Referred to as Event 201, the public footage of this two-and-a-half day exercise shamelessly records a cabal of high-level Deep Staters pre-planning the mass eviction of critics, especially vaccine sceptics, from the public square. Robert Kennedy Jr. explains that:
At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, war-gaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.
As we will note in more detail, the shamelessly conflicted participants brought together for this exercise by Bill Gates included, among many others: a Chinese government rep, a 'former' director of the CIA and NSA, reps from Big Pharma and Big Media, and a public relations guru.
Yes, it might all be astoundingly coincidental — were it not for the fact that in politics there are no coincidences. Especially when oligarchic money, power and control — above all population control — is involved. That at least was the instinctive take of those unnerved by this creepy choreography, who immediately sensed the Orwellian theatre still to come.
On the other hand, faced with the unprecedented Western lockstep and the myriad murky vested interests directing it, the great majority, to include swathes of academia and the medical establishment itself, preferred, per usual, to bury their heads and suspend their critical faculties. Supinely, they imbibed the hourly flow of deceitful figures and arbitrary rules that turned Event 201's pre-ordained propagandistic "flood" into a tsunami of misinformation, disinformation and censored information; a tidal wave that continues to level lives, livelihoods and liberties en masse.
This wickedness will become even more despicable, however, if we allow the sheer scale of the tumult to sweep away the culpability of the governing class of bankers, financiers, technocrats and politicians (in that hierarchical order, alas) for the devastation wreaked by their fabricated "crisis."(2)
Manifold red flags spoke early and often to the dreadful truth that it's not the virus but its politicisation that exacerbates the death and debilitation. And yet, as we saw in Part I, those responsible are being ludicrously hailed as saviours instead of culprits. We cannot allow them to continue hiding behind official spin that we are still in unchartered waters and threatened by this 'killer virus' (— re-signalled locally by the recent ban on overseas travel for fear of importing "mutations" into Britain). If we do not continually review and repudiate their self-serving narrative — which evinces a backs-to-the-wall struggle against a smallpox-like foe — it will enter the history books uncontested; washing away the blood on their hands, and absolving them of all guilt.
Accurate early calls
The plain fact is that it took no time at all to establish the very limited age and health parameters of the Covid threat. Moreover, from the very beginning, even as "follow the science" became the hollow mantra (and epitaph) of the decidedly unscientific Establishment, it was precisely "the science" which, in one form or another, very quickly buttressed Sweden's brave and principled decision to stand apart from the unexplored, uncosted, always potentially catastrophic lockdown route collectively trod — herdlike; sans due diligence — by the so-called "community of nations."
Typical of the regular narrative-busting information rapidly buried under strategic mounds of mind-numbing stats was a report published in the British Medical Journal of 13 May 2020. Titled, Covid-19: Staggering number of extra deaths in community is not explained by covid-19, it suggested that: quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the months of April and May.
Data-averse Covid True Believers (Cov-TBs) should know that this hard data revealed as early as April 2020 that even using the government's vastly inflated fatality figures, Covid-19 deaths still only accounted for 10,000 of the 30,000 excess deaths recorded in senior care facilities during the height of the pandemic. The article further suggested and also quoted British Health officials stating that these unexplained deaths may have occurred because ofquarantine measures: by way of having prevented seniors from accessing the healthcare they needed.
This early, readily available science was not rocket science. Mere laymen clearly perceived that it contradicted the lockdown narrative, challenged the repetitious fearmongering, and confirmed suspicions about mandatory masking and other scientifically dubious rules. If, that is,they were paying attention. Sadly and foolishly, the Cov-TBs placed their trust in the Establishment instead of scrutinising scary headlines that trumpeted studies at odds with the calm reassurance of 'dissenting' specialists — who, unlike the Fergusons, Elliotts, Whittys, Vallances and Faucis of the world, were credible.
In the end, the forecasts of countless numbers of these pre-eminent, uncompromised, inspirational doctors and scientists worldwide, such as the quietly spoken Dr. Bhattacharya, a Professor of Medicine at Stanford University and one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration,(3) have proven correct.
They. Got. It. Right.
Every step of the way.
Not least in their initial infection fatality forecasts of 0.1-0.3 or thereabouts.
In mid-April 2020, as the real pandemic exploded around us — namely, the debilitating fear and hysteria triggered by a world health technocracy and media compromised by Chinese, Gates and Big Pharma billions — Dr. Bhattacharya for one was calmly informing Fox News' Tucker Carlson that he believed the actual death rate from the coronavirus would be "likely orders of magnitude lower than the initial estimates." He told Carlson, "I'm hoping to get numbers in place. We'll be able to really sort of quell the fear that's out there."
In fact, like Ireland's Dr. Dolores Cahill and so many other brave experts unencumbered by medical/healthcare group-think, the good doctor had laid out his professional estimation earlier still. In a Wall Street Journal commentary of 24 March 2020 co-authored with a fellow Stanford Professor of Medicine, Dr. Eran Bendavid, Dr. Bhattacharya wrote very simply, objectively, sensibly and truly [my emphases]:
If it’s true that the novel coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines, then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified. But there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high.
Fear of Covid-19 is based on its high estimated case fatality rate—2% to 4% of people with confirmed Covid-19 have died, according to the World Health Organisation and others. So if 100 million Americans ultimately get the disease, two million to four million could die. We believe that estimate is deeply flawed. The true fatality rate is the portion of those infected who die, not the deaths from identified positive cases.
The latter rate is misleading because of selection bias in testing. The degree of bias is uncertain because available data are limited. But it could make the difference between an epidemic that kills 20,000 and one that kills two million. If the number of actual infections is much larger than the number of cases—orders of magnitude larger—then the true fatality rate is much lower as well. That’s not only plausible but likely based on what we know so far.
The two doctors went on to prove their point using population samples from China, Italy, Iceland and the U.S.. Basing their calculations on the number of infections rather than spurious "cases," they demonstrated, for example, that the Chinese fatality rate was "at least 10-fold lower than estimates based on reported cases." And again, "Since Italy’s case fatality rate of 8% is estimated using the confirmed cases, the real [infection-based] fatality rate could in fact be closer to 0.06%."
There were many such early calculations offered for medical and scientific scrutiny, setting forth why estimates of the WHO and national health bureaucrats were wrong by whopping "orders of magnitude." Yet the noble quest of Dr. Bhattacharya and his colleagues to "quell the fear" was thwarted at every turn by Big Media and Big Tech — the Praetorian Guard of all official narratives pushed by pseudo-sovereign governments joined at the hip with the Gatesian-pharmaceutical industry: the grubby local face of which was exposed in recent editions by Vanessa Beeley.
It is one thing for establishment scientists to mouth the odd truthful soundbite when it simply cannot be avoided. It's quite another to consistently explicate the truth in the face of fierce hostility, as Bhattacharya did by revisiting Tucker Carlson in late October to further reassure his audience by reasserting the initial estimates he forecast six months earlier.
"Per case, I don't think it's as deadly as people thought," he said. "... The World Health Organisation put an estimate out that was, I think, initially 3.4 percent. It's very unlikely it is anywhere near that. It's much likely, much closer to the death rate that you see from the flu per case."
By that time, his projections and those of his demonised/marginalised/censored peers had been long vindicated. In May, even UK Chief Medical Officer Dr. Chris Whitty, the compromised driver of Britain's "Clattering Train" careering from one covidic deception and debacle to another, had hypocritically professed that Covid-19 was "harmless to the vast majority" (even as he continued to treat it like smallpox). While in October the WHO announced that it was "right in line with seasonal influenza."
In view of those official assessments and their alignment with the view of so-called 'dissenters', only ulterior motives can possibly explain why the likes of Dr. Bhattacharya, his fellow authors of the Great Barrington Declaration and many others held in the same high esteem by authorities prior to March 2020, were suddenly excommunicated from inner sanctums of policy formulation worldwide.
None dare call it conspiracy
In fact, the "ulterior motives" are not so ulterior.Quite simply, clinical corrections of frightening yet baseless Covid projections and measures threatened powerful vested interests holding unprecedented sway over nations and governments, especially Big Pharma and their billionaire backers.
Boasting that his $10 billion investment in vaccine development and distribution over the past 20 years has returned $200 billion, Gates for one naturally advocates the vaccination of every person on earth. "Over a 20:1 return ... that's a pretty strong number compared to anything else," he told CNBC, adding by way of comparison that a similar investment in the S&P 500 (America’s largest corporations) would have yielded him a dividend of 'only' $17 billion. [Davos interview, 23/1/19].
So, quite apart from the sorts of ideological agendas supported by out and proud depopulation advocates like Gates, the Rockefellers, Boris Johnson, et. al., with short-term billions and long-term trillions at stake for the giant pharmaceutical companies, their partners, and intertwined government stakeholders, there was never the slightest chance of medical and scientific 'dissidents' being permitted to follow anything but a 'science' at the service of mammon. This is why, in the fourth and final section of their "table-top" simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic, Event 201 devoted two full hours to discussing — pointedly and specifically — how to control the press, and how to remove from public discourse those who interfered with their plans; above all those who dared to jeopardise their vaccine gold rush.
To repeat: the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media. That this fascist agenda was brutally implemented within months makes perfect sense when the participants themselves are factored in. Robert Kennedy notes that "Gates' co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm."
During this elaborate pandemic war-game, each of these self-interested participants played his/her role in scripted discussions that stressed mechanisms for controlling "disinformation" and "misinformation," by "flooding" the media with propaganda ("good information"), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement. Concern for transparency and evidence-based discussion and debate was notably absent.
At one point, the Chinese government representative (George Gao, director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control) urged the immediate suppression of "rumours" circulating that the virus was laboratory generated and deliberately released. Yes, you read that correctly: a Chinese official floating the notion of a lab-created virus escaping a lab was helping Gates and his hand-picked cabal of Deep State functionaries plan the West's pandemic response barely two months before Covid either escaped or was released from Wuhan; whether from the Wuhan Institute of Virology bio-lab, in which it was almost certainly created according to official investigations and courageous whistleblowers, or its surrounds.(4)
Gao's compatriot, Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on track-and-trace and facial recognition technology, role-played the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures. He blamed riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicted that Twitter and Facebook will co-operate in "identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak" and to implement "internet shutdowns … to quell panic."
Dr. Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, concurred. "We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news" she reminded her fellow collaborators, "so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation." Echoing Huang, she revelled in the various ways and means that government and industry allies could accomplish this objective: "Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation.
Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests."
With social media fingered as the major vehicle for all this unacceptable obstinacy and dissent (read: critical thinking), Avril Haines, a former deputy director of the CIA who clearly lacks all self-awareness, stepped forward to unveil a strategy to "flood the zone" with propaganda from "trusted sources," including "influential community leaders, as well as health workers," in order to counter "false information." All a bit rich when the very raison d'être of her 'former' Agency is falsehood!
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, piped up to reassure everyone that the Gates Foundation is already creating algorithms "to sift through information on these social media platforms" to protect the public from thoughts and information that displease them. It will come as no surprise whatsoever to learn that shortly afterwards Ms Halton helped co-author Australia’s Orwellian "no jab, no pay" policy.
Robert Kennedy nailed it when he observed that: "The universal and single-minded presumption among participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state." That was it. Boom! A clamour for suppression and control of free speech by minions of the 1% that thundered like jackboots on a stairwell.
While somewhere in eternity George Orwell shivered, the participants doubled-down on dystopia. Tom Inglesby, the Johns Hopkins biosecurity expert advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland Security, agreed that centralised control was needed: "You mean centralised international?" he asked rhetorically. Matthew Harrington (the Edelman PR guru) replied that information access should be "Centralised on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages." Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects confirmed that: "If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice."
Yet if this all evokes the dreaded din of jackboots to our ears, to those of the Silicon Valley mob it is beautiful music. For, by controlling the social media "narrative" they can prolong a crisis indefinitely while they accumulate unprecedented wealth and power over humanity. According to Robert Kennedy Jr. they have pocketed a large part of the "transfer of a trillion dollars of wealth upward since the lockdowns began." Gates alone, Kennedy notes, has made $22 billion in that time. This money has been ripped from a middle class all but obliterated in America, where a million businesses have been bankrupted, half of which will never re-open — all part of the "engineered war" against them as explained by Catherine Austin Fitts (see footnote 2). Their wealth has been pocketed by billionaires. Specifically the renowned Big Tech billionaires, and communications bigwigs like Michael Bloomberg who, together with Gates, co-sponsored Event 201.
But let us take heart from the fact that not all multi-billionaires have conspired or danced to Gates' tune. Elon Musk for one. Displaying his strong, independent South African spirit, the famous entrepreneur has kept his U.S. factories open despite national lockdown orders. He regards the lockdown as a "no-win situation" and said it had "diminished" his "faith in humanity" because people have been irrational in the face of the virus. "What we have is something with a very low mortality rate and high contagion," he simply and accurately informed The New York Times during a podcast interview last September. Despite the fact that his electric car manufacturing company, Tesla, makes vaccine machines for CureVac, and his team having spent "quite a lot of time with the Harvard epidemiology team doing antibody studies," neither he nor his family will get the vaccine because "I’m not at risk for Covid, nor are my [six] kids."
Since smiling and laughing through the "crisis" is itself healthy and curative, Musk's delightful swipe at his fellow billionaire's scornful view of his vaccine scepticism is also worth recounting. "Gates said something about me not knowing what I was doing," he said. "It’s like, hey, knucklehead, we actually make the vaccines for CureVac, that company you’re invested in" — to the tune of $52 million in fact!
Mr Gates is prone to such convenient memory lapses. Although co-funded by him, and despite the entire proceedings being freely available to view online, he also denies what transpired at Event 201, waving away concerns as wild conspiracy talk! This of course is the hackneyed, albeit extremely effective charge routinely trotted out by white-collar crooks to shut down scrutiny of their evil activities. Bill even dares to smear as conspiracy nuts those who adduce raw footage of the outrageous conflicts of interest that defined his exercise, since he must at all costs deflect attention from its concentrated two-and-a-half day focus on fabulously lucrative vaccines while devoting zero hours to cheap, protective, immune-boosting measures like taking Vitamin D, eating nutritious food, etc..
All the while Gates himself conspires with the press to pull off this inversion of reality. As Robert Kennedy points out, the media — controlled by the $9.6 billion expended on advertising by Gates' Big Pharma partners — never "ever asks Gates or his mini-me, Tony Fauci, why they chose to spend tens of billions in taxpayer dollars on speculative vaccines and zero dollars investigating the many off-the-shelf, off-patent medications that have demonstrated extraordinary success in the hands of private doctors — medications that might have ended the pandemic a year ago."
That early, humane pathway was never a possibility.
The pandemic simulating-Reset Mob stands accused before their own documents, one of which revealed that the World Bank initiated a five-year "Project" at the very start. Clearly pre-prepared and ready to roll out, it is titled, "Covid-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Program (SPRP)".The "Expected Project Approval Date" is listed as "2 April 2020." The "Expected Project Closing Date" is "31 March 2025."
Despite more red flags than a Chinese military parade, none dare call this conspiracy. Most are so fearful of the weaponised "conspiracy theory" slur they would not even concede the milder connotation of the Latin root word conspiratio: a "breathing together" of like-minded men simply moving together in a certain direction (say, well-meaning politicians and bureaucrats) all the while being manipulated by the relative few (the 1% and their apparatchiks) to suit the basic interests of the manipulators and so the real conspiracy itself.
This timid and tiresome reluctance to admit the obvious is a futile exercise. The denial negates neither the globalist machinations themselves, nor the nefarious pedigree that confirms and amplifies the conspiracy clearly at play.
Dark Winter
The "pedigree" comprises the long line of similar "table-top" pandemic exercises pre-dating Event 201, all touting a crushing, dictatorial response. The aptly headed Lock Step section of the Rockefeller Foundation's final report of its 2010 exercise, for instance, urges the introduction of "top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership" in the immediate wake of a pandemic, and its institutionalisationthereafter. This implacable approach reflects precisely the totalising spirit that gripped the hearts and minds of policy makers in March 2020. Indeed the Lock Step section reads like the current Covid charters of Downing Street, the White House, and every other oppressive national strategy. Consider these few Lock Step paragraphs:
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. ... [It] had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
That was the eerily familiar scenario set forth by the Rockefellers in 2010. As with all the pandemic simulations down the years, it is actually "predictive programming": a subtle form of psychological conditioning beloved of the pseudo-elites and perfected by the CIA via the whole communications spectrum: entertainment-media, advertisements, books etc. The goal is to reduce resistance by acquainting the public with planned societal changes; introducing concepts that seem far-fetched and continuously reintroducing them to make these concepts appear more likely or at the very least acceptable.
The chain of pandemic simulations predictively programming the world stretch back to Dark Winter (the chilling echo of which exercise one discerned in Joe Biden's warnings — or, to be precise, the warnings of the senile Biden's handlers — of a coming "dark winter"). A bio-warfare simulation held in Washington in June 2001, Dark Winter is instructive apropos the continuity of personnel and psyop methodology behind viral false flags and associated fearmongering. It not only predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks that quickly and conveniently followed just three months later, some of its participants also had clear foreknowledge of those attacks.(5) In a lengthy investigative series which commenced in The American Vagabond of 1 April 2020, co-authors Whitney Webb and Raul Diego note that Dark Winter "also predicted many aspects of government pandemic response that would later re-emerge in last October’s simulation Event 201....In addition, the U.S. government would lead its own multi-part series of pandemic simulations, called Crimson Contagion, that would also predict aspects of the Covid-19 outbreak and government response."
For instance, Dark Winter replicates Event 201 in warning of "dangerous misinformation" spreading online, promoting "unverified" cures and making "unverified" claims, all of which are deemed as posing a threat to public safety. Dark Winter further discusses the suppression and removal of civil liberties, such as the possibility of the President invoking "The Insurrection Act," which would allow the military to act as law enforcement upon request by a State governor, as well as the possibility of "martial rule." The Dark Winter script also discusses how options for martial rule "include, but are not limited to, prohibition of free assembly, national travel ban, quarantine of certain areas, suspension of the writ of habeas corpus [arrest without due process], and/or military trials in the event that the court system becomes dysfunctional." This repetition and dictatorial approach makes perfect sense insofar as the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security that co-hosted Event 201 is currently led by Dark Winter co-author Thomas Inglesby. Webb and Diego go on:
Upon further investigation, key leaders of both Event 201 and Crimson Contagion, not only have deep and longstanding ties to U.S. Intelligence and the U.S. Department of Defense, they were all previously involved in that same June 2001 exercise, Dark Winter. Some of these same individuals would also play a role in the FBI’s “sabotaged” investigation into the subsequent Anthrax attacks and are now handling major aspects of the U.S. government’s response to the Covid-19 crisis. One of those individuals, Robert Kadlec, was recently put in charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) entire Covid-19 response efforts, despite the fact that he was recently and directly responsible for actions that needlessly infected Americans with Covid-19.
Other major players in Dark Winter are now key drivers behind the “biodefense” mass surveillance programs currently being promoted as a technological solution to Covid-19’s spread, despite evidence that such programs actually worsen pandemic outbreaks. Others still have close connections to the insider trading that recently occurred among a select group of U.S. Senators regarding the economic impact of Covid-19 and are set to personally profit from lucrative contracts to develop not just one, but the majority, of experimental Covid-19 treatments and vaccines currently under development by U.S. companies.
This investigative series, entitled Engineering Contagion: Amerithrax, Coronavirus and the Rise of the Biotech-Industrial Complex, will examine these disturbing parallels between the 2001 anthrax attacks and the current scandals and “solutions” of the Covid-19 crisis as well as the simulations that eerily preceded both events. By tracing key actors in Dark Winter from 2001 to the present, it is also possible to trace the corruption that has lurked behind U.S. “biodefense” and pandemic preparedness efforts for decades and which now is rearing its ugly head as pandemic panic distracts the American and global public from the fundamentally untrustworthy, and frankly dangerous, individuals who are in control of the U.S. government’s and corporate America’s response.
Given their involvement in Dark Winter and, more recently, Event 201 and Crimson Contagion, this series seeks to explore the possibility that, just like the 2001 anthrax attacks, government insiders had foreknowledge of the Covid-19 crisis on a scale that, thus far, has gone unreported and that those same insiders are now manipulating the government’s response and public panic in order to reap record profits and gain unprecedented power themselves and control over people’s lives.
SPARS: smoking gun #1
Of all the pandemic simulations held from Dark Winter through Lockstep to Event 201 (which along the way included Clade X [May 2018], Disease X [Feb. 2018], and Crimson Contagion [January-August 2019], among others) the most blatant 'smoking gun' was "The SPARS Pandemic: 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators."
Held in October 2017 and sponsored by the usual sinister suspects (World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, and Johns Hopkins University), SPARS 2025-2028 was recently examined in forensic fashion by Infowars' Alex Jones and his team of researchers. They drew on over 20 documents and more than 100 news articles in a presentation that General Mike Flynn praised to the skies for its important thoroughgoing expose of the Covid scam, which the SPARS exercise previewed like no other, often to the very letter.
For starters, the virus in the SPARS simulation originated in the "Far East" but was labelled St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SPARS-CoV), thus mirroring the title later assigned to the COVID-19 coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, which also spread from the Far East and was also labelled so as to distract from its origin. How they knew to label the virus used in their 2017 pandemic drill almost the exact same name as the virus that appeared two years later might be explained by the fact that SARS-CoV-2 had been discovered in European sewage systems long before Wuhan made it famous. IMF documents from 2018-19 also reference the virus pre-Wuhan. Like other dormant viruses, it may have been circulating for years.(6)
In this regard, take note that as well as running predictive programming via pandemic simulations, the pseudo-elites have been busy securing relevant coronavirus patents in advance for a long time, including Covid-19!.
On 13 October 2015 a patent for a "System and Method for Testing for COVID-19"was filed with a Dutch government organisation by one Richard A. Rothschild. To repeat: four (4) years before the disease even existed, a testing method for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) was developed by the Rothschilds; the central banking-Dons of the Great Reset Mafia.
The 2015 Rothschild patent reads: "A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19." A second associated patent was filed and published in the U.S. two years later, on 24 April and 10 August 2017 respectively. The SPARS exercise took place in October 2017.
Consider, too, that in 2017 and 2018 — two (2) years before COVID-19 — hundreds of millions of specifically labelled "COVID-19" test kits were distributed worldwide.
Doubtless the parties concerned would wave away these alarming anomalies as perfectly explicable and uncontroversial. But then, like Bill Gates dismissing the Orwellian machinations and conflicts of interest at Event 201, they would, wouldn't they?
Returning to the SPARS exercise, it also mimicked the huge inflation of fatality rates which have defined the scripted response to Covid-19. The SPARS fatality rate estimations ranged from CDC 4.7%; WHO 14.5% under 64 years of age/50% over 64. Similarly, inflated Covid-19 estimates included the 2.2 million U.S. deaths and 500,000+ U,K. deaths posited by Imperial College, and the WHO's prediction of a mammoth 3.5% fatality rate worldwide.
Against those fearmongering figures, the SPARS exercise concluded with a mere 0.06% fatality rate. Similarly, the actual Covid-19 death rates are also miniscule — 0-19 years: 0.003%; 20-49 years: 0.02%; 50-69 years: 0.5%. While the higher 5.4% fatality rate in the over 70s is deceptive, being largely down to criminal neglect of the sick and vulnerable, whether at home or in nursing homes, the lethal use of ventilators, etc. etc. Meantime, the American CDC itself admitted, and the New York Times reported, that a paltry 6% of the massive number of officially recorded U.S. Covid deaths were actually due to Covid-19; the other 94% being caused by underlying illnesses (2.6 comorbidities on average).
Rothschild Covid-19 patent filing, 13 October 2015.
Dutch Government patent registry website (screenshot)
Another hair-raising parallel is the short several month period of time between the appearance of the virus and the signing of vaccine contracts. The SPARS-Cov virus emerged in October 2025, and by January 2026 the U.S. government had contracted a pharmaceutical company to produce a SPARS vaccine. Covid-19 was identified on 31 December 2019 and the U.S. government launched its Operation Warp Speed vaccine drive in April 2020. Furthermore, both the simulated and the actual vaccine drives were done under "emergency authorisation," which allowed the circumvention of normal research times and safety protocols.
The vaccine propaganda scripts also featured precisely the same line ups: Big Tech, the President and ex-Presidents, celebrities, mainstream media, global health experts like Dr. Fauci, the Surgeon General et.al., all lining up to laud the vaccine. Even the antivirals used in the SPARS-CoV mirrored those that appeared with SARS-CoV-2. The side-effects of an experimental drug dreamt up for the simulation pandemic, called "Kalocivir," caused debilitating side effects: "nausea, headaches, vomiting and body aches." The similar sounding Remdesivir antiviral used to treat Covid-19 causes the same side effects: "nausea, constipation, vomiting, sweating, shivering."
The creepiness continues with comparable power outages. In the SPARS exercise, 10 months into the pandemic, at the start of the vaccine rollout, the Pacific Northwest of America experiences a massive two week outage. Thirteen months into Covid-19, and just two months into the vaccine rollout, Texas, geographically about the same size as the combined Pacific Northwest area used for the SPARS outage scenario, had a major one week blackout.
Several sections and appendices of SPARS are devoted to dealing with eerily familiar themes: public pushback; changing the guidelines (e.g., "14 days to stop the spread"; No Masks then Yes Masks); Big Tech censorship of doctors using bought-and-paid-for Fact-Checkers to "debunk" and deplatform any challenge to the government narrative; and the propagandistic use of viral videos and social media posts to maintain trust in government. The SPARS narrative labelled these censorship strategies "Medical Countermeasures (MCM)".
Pre-empting "conspiracy theories"
The similarities are precise and stunning. To read the SPARS script (which even includes a male-female/presidency-vice presidency) is not only to relive every arbitrary, contradictory and oppressive official action and response we have experienced since March 2020 — but in the same chronological order! As Alex Jones put it in the course of laying out the damning facts.
We're supposed to be puppets living through their little Shakespearian death play. They've created a giant play that's 'reality', and we're all supposed to conform, or we get censored or blacklisted. But if we play along with it, and become robots, then we live.
One of his colleagues added: "You're either in their virtual reality" — viz., the transhuman Fourth Industrial Revolution man-machine-'reality' touted by Klaus Schwab — "or you're censored."
Another remarked on the massive deplatforming of medical doctors and removal of their YouTube videos because they are not on Covid message. "And how many of those videos do we have [safely archived by Infowars] on banned.video?" he asked. "We probably don't have even half of what's been taken off. Because they just keep removing, removing, removing."
"And it's all premeditated," Jones emphasised. "The [SPARS] simulation is reality. They're testing it, preparing it, and getting their people ready. We're just taking the time to view it [the 75-page SPARS document]. But it is for their people in different areas to get familiar with this terminology. So when it actually rolls out, they know the correct response." He notes, for instance, how the SPARS scenario includes this specific heads up:
"Conspiracy theories also proliferated across social media, suggesting that the virus had purposely been created and introduced to the population by drug companies or had escaped from a government lab secretly testing bio-weapons."
A few years later, even the likes of Newsweek attested to this reality under headlines trumpeting Dr. Fauci's illegal funding of insanely dangerous research at the Wuhan bio-lab. Yet by alerting their 'troops', says Jones, "when we come out and say that [about Wuhan and Fauci], they already have a line for it [i.e., "conspiracy theory"]. They've thought about it and have the correct response."
The premeditation is further exemplified in the army of Fact-Checkers conjured up just in time to bamboozle online Covid-19 truth-seekers by discrediting and burying inconvenient truth-tellers. In fact, the strategy had already been laid out in SPARS. Via Gates and Big Tech it was primed and ready to subvert when the time was right. Spurious fact-checks now dominate online searches about Covid-related issues. Only those aware of the ploy would scroll far enough down their screens to reach links offering objective information.
The zero credibility of the process itself was exposed at the outset by outstanding reporters like Sharyl Attkisson: a seasoned, award-winning investigative journalist who pointed out that "If you follow the info, you will find the Facebook fake fact-checker on the China Wuhan lab is a scientist [Australian Dr. Danielle Anderson] who works/worked at China's Wuhan lab the past two years and says it is impossible that they would be sloppy because they are very careful!"
Even the social media soundbites and hashtags are identical. For example: SPARS 2017 - "Happy Thanksgiving. Be safe on Black Friday. Have a virtual cyber Monday instead." CDC 2020 - "Have a virtual Thanksgiving to lessen the risk of Covid-19."
"#Vaccineswork", tweeted by a fake rapper in SPARS, was the exact hashtag used by former Surgeon General Jerome Adams during Covid-19. And as with SPARS, rappers have been deployed to convince the black community to set aside its fears — rooted in the Tuskegee Syphillis Experiment; the 40-year long public health conspiracy waged against unsuspecting African Americans — and take the experimental Covid-19 vaccine. "#Takethevaccine, it's not tuskegee," was the repetitive rap line.
Projecting vaccine impacts and outcries
Having vaccine promoters refer to such things as Tuskegee once again underscores the deliberation, intent and forward planning of these wargames. So we should take particular note of the SPARS forecast that neurological symptoms will surface among the vaccinated six months to a year later. The script reads:
After showing no side-effects for nearly a year, vaccine recipients slowly begin to experience symptoms. As time passed and more people across the United States were vaccinated, claims of adverse side-effects began to emerge.
Things deteriorate even further two years after SPARS emerges:
Near the end of 2027 reports of new neurological symptoms begin to emerge. Several parents complained that their children were experiencing neurological symptoms. That month, parents whose children developed mental retardation as a result of encephalitis in the wake of the CoraVax vaccination, sued the federal government, demanding removal of the liability shield protecting the pharmaceutical companies responsible for manufacturing CoraVax.
SPARS factors in the sort of public outrage which may not be far from surfacing in response to the ill-effects of experimental Covid-19 jabs; not least the mRNA mutation-machine passed off as a 'vaccine.' Researcher Jay Dyer sums up the SPARS scenario:
So, six months to one year after the mass inoculation the problems commence: brain inflammation, and the Prion Disease,(7) which leads to a public reaction, outcry, anger. And remember we’ve just hit the point, supposedly, according to Reuters, where there’s been 100 million people vaccinated. That’s where we are right now. So from now to six months to a year is when this document projects a sort of mass outcry.
As today, neither terrible effects nor outcries derailed the push for broad vaccination programmes, the SPARS script warning that: "Future outbreaks will continue to emerge unless countries maintain widespread vaccination programmes." (Ka-ching!)
The Big Three
Now, conditioning populations for their own viral demise through predictive programming is one thing. Breathing actual life into scripted narratives is another. After all, only totalitarian regimes like China can micro-manage murderous plans in toto.
And yet, the current fascistic corporate-political states of the West can orchestrate wargame outcomes with relative ease. To comprehend how readily strings can be pulled in one direction — even towards the cold-blooded censoring of vital medical and scientific truths upon which millions of lives depend — consider the astonishing financial power of a mere handful of individuals.
Quite apart from the power wielded by Mr. Gates in the realm of vaccines and the credible case for his having corrupted public health bureaucracies worldwide, in an article titled "These three firms own corporate America" (by Jan Fichtner, Eelke Heemskerk, and Javier Garcia-Bernardo, theconversation.com, 19/5/17), we learn that three of the most powerful corporate bosses in America have deep connections to major hospitals, and these three men run corporations that own corporate America — which, in turn, all but owns the entire world.
The three men are Larry Fink, Joseph Hooley, and Mortimer Buckley. Buckley is the CEO of the Vanguard Group. Hooley is the CEO of State Street. Fink is the CEO of BlackRock.
Known as the Big Three, these three companies are investment funds. Financial services companies. "Together, BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street have nearly US$11 trillion in assets under management," state the authors. "We found that the Big Three, taken together, have become the largest shareholder in 40% of all publicly listed firms in the United States. In 2015, these 1,600 American firms [the 40%] had combined revenues of about US$9.1 trillion, a market capitalisation of more than US$17 trillion, and employed more than 23.5 million people."
"In the S&P 500 – the benchmark index of America’s largest corporations – the situation is even more extreme. Together, the Big Three are the largest single shareholder in almost 90% of S&P 500 firms, including Apple, Microsoft, ExxonMobil, General Electric and Coca-Cola. What is undeniable is that the Big Three do exert the voting rights attached to these shares. Therefore, they have to be perceived as de facto owners by corporate executives."
Reviewing the article, seasoned investigative journalist Jon Rappoport explains the devastating implications for the politicisation of health in general and Covid in particular:
If, the CEO of a corporation whose main shareholder is The Big Three thinks about rebelling against the official medical consensus…
And he knows that The Big Three bosses are heavily wired into the US medical complex…
That CEO has one more reason, among others, to forget about being an old-time hard charger. He has one more reason to swallow his anger when he’s told to lock down and shut down. He has one more reason to knuckle under and play the game. He has one more reason to surrender to a story about a virus and Fauci and Bill Gates. He has one more reason to stand down and stand aside and watch economic devastation sweep over the land.
The Big Three's vast medical interests and the huge amounts of money handed to U.S. hospitals for the treatment of Covid patients ensured that this corporate complicity extended to physical devastation (injury and murder) too.(8) It also evinces the root reason for shutting so many distinguished and hitherto eagerly consulted specialists out of the policy process. Their reputations and careers are simply collateral damage in a ruthless drive to consolidate and centralise profits, power and control.
Eugenics: the crux of the conspiracy
Embodied by Gates and the Big Three, this megalomaniacal greed and grasping, not public health or philanthropy, has always been the real driver of the pandemic simulations, with a view to the main goals: trillion-dollar vaccination programmes serving extreme, ultimately eugenic, environmental and population control agendas.
Here, high profile types like the vaccine-obsessed Rockefellers immediately spring to mind. Yet this wicked ideology is far more entrenched within the technocratic Establishment than we realise. For instance, a lengthy article has explored the ties between the lead developer of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine and eugenics-linked bodies like the Galton Institute (formerly the British Eugenics Society).
It's undeniable that several prominent individuals and institutions that remain active today have clear ties to eugenicist thinking, which was not so taboo just a few decades ago. Unfortunately, this holds true for the individuals and institutions associated with the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine, who, as demonstrated in this article, immerse themselves in studies of race science and population control—primarily in Africa—while working closely with institutions that have direct and longstanding links to the worst of the eugenics movement.(9)
As ever, the Rockefellers, Gates & Co. lead from the front. "First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people," Bill Gates instructed his audience at a TED conference in February 2010.(10) "That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services [read: abortion, contraception, sterilisation, homosexualisation, etc.], we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent." Do the math. Bill would happily "disappear" nearly a billion people.
In the same vein, Gates publicly announced in 2018 that a global pandemic was on its way that could wipe out 30 million people. He said this would probably happen during the next decade. His wife, Melinda, added that an engineered virus is humanities greatest threat, also insisting this would hit us in the very near future. Thus, we are on notice that not just any virus but an engineered virus of smallpox virility is on its way; a supremely confident assertion before which the Covid-19 beat up is clearly and merely a trial run.
Ostentatious love of money-making covers over this malign obsession of the pseudo-elites. It is no surprise that Gates cavorted with the late degenerate billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, Mossad's super-pimp-cum-child trafficker to the rich and famous, since Epstein too was obsessed with population control and eugenics. Gates used Epstein as a channel for making donations to MIT. “Gates has yet to explain why he would funnel his donations through Epstein as opposed to publicly donating via his well-known ‘philanthropic’ foundation,” writes Whitney Webb. [The Last American Vagabond, 5/2/21]
"At one session at Harvard," recalled cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker, "Mr. Epstein criticised efforts to reduce starvation and provide health care to the poor because doing so increased the risk of overpopulation." [New York Times, 31/7/19] Epstein funded eugenic projects, including one by a Harvard geneticist, even hatching a scheme to "seed the human race with his DNA."
Epstein also bragged about funding the research of gene-editing expert Eric Lander, and was photographed taking part in at least one meeting with him, in 2012. Lander, Joe Biden’s director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, is awaiting Senate confirmation to serve in a new Cabinet-level position in the Biden administration. He denies having had a relationship with Epstein, but according to Whitney Webb is “closely associated with tech companies deeply tied to the US national security state, as the founding director of the Broad Institute, an independent genomic research institution partnered with both MIT and Harvard… the two academic institutions most closely linked to Epstein’s ‘philanthropy’, particularly in the in the field in which the Broad Institute specialises.”
“Lander has also courted controversy for a controversial toast he led in honour of eugenicist James Dewey Watson in 2018,” writes Webb. “On Watson’s ninetieth birthday, Lander praised Watson for “inspiring all of us to push the frontiers of science to benefit humankind.” Watson, though best remembered as the co-discoverer of the DNA double-helix structure, was also a notorious eugenicist who stated his belief that people of African descent have genetically inferior intelligence on numerous occasions.” She also relates these further influential links in the eugenic chain:
Lander’s relationship with Watson goes back to Lander’s extensive work as part of the Human Genome Project, a project in which Watson was also intimately involved. …. [T]he original call for the Human Genome Project was first published in 1986 by geneticist Walter Bodmer. Bodmer joined the Eugenics Society, today called the Galton Institute, as a young man back in the 1960s and soon after went to work with Stanford biologist/geneticist Joshua Lederberg. Lederberg was a key scientific adviser to US presidents and the US military during the course of his decades-long career. Bodmer then served as the Eugenics Society/Galton Institute president from 2008 to 2014. One of the organization’s current officers, David J. Galton, wrote that the Human Genome Project that Bodmer originally proposed had “enormously increased . . . the scope for eugenics . . . because of the development of a very powerful technology for the manipulation of DNA.”
Webb, concludes:
The fact that Lander was even nominated for this position [in the Biden administration], particularly following the Epstein scandal, is stunning; he should have been investigated and, at minimum, blacklisted from holding public office. Lander’s nomination to such a prominent post is unsettling confirmation of the continued influence and power of the network that not only created Jeffrey Epstein but financed and protected his nefarious activities for decades.
Digging into the familial, academic and business background of Klaus Schwab, a figurehead of the Covid conspiracy, Johnny Vedmore discovered the same eugenic/population control tie-in. "It becomes clear," he writes, "that Schwab’s real role has long been to “shape global, regional and industry agendas” of the present in order to ensure the continuity of larger, much older agendas that came into disrepute after World War II, not just nuclear technology, but also eugenics-influenced population control policies." [Unlimited Hangout, 10/2/21]
In his chilling tome, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Schwab, a mechanical engineer by upbringing and training, literally likens the man-machine endgame he promotes therein to Prometheus: whereby man will be changed and everything genetically modified to produce a new type of reality. One where we evolve from biology and carbon into a kind of synthetic, wireless, Teilhardian noosphere of integration, unification and consciousness; a world wherein birth itself will be dictated by nanotechnology.
Sci-fi insanity to be sure. But "That at least is [Schwab's] endlessly re-stated plan," says Jay Dyer, an authority on the writings of elite Malthusian technocrats:
"[Schwab] says the key to all this is energy, and we have to control the energy via the smart-tech, via the tracking, via a robot drone fleet that will police everything after everything has been sprayed with smart-dust [to improve wireless signals]. Say what we like about it, that is what he thinks; one of the most influential people among the global, liberal-left elite."
Outwardly a Bond-style megalomaniac, Schwab may look and sound like a Nazi super-villain but he is no joke. The Great Reset he fronts is just one facet of the conspiracy to rewrite reality. The other involves the literal eradication of man by the backdoor of medicine, science and mass vaccinations; a century-old open conspiracy touted in texts like The Survival of the Wisest by Dr. Jonas Salk of polio vaccination fame, and The Turning Point by Fritjof Capra.
A further major objective is to serve as the principle vehicle for attempting to bring these demonic goals to fruition. As Cardinal Müller has warned (and the Event 201 conspirators fiercely flagged) this additional goal — to be achieved through the growing collaboration of monopolistic capitalist entities with China — is "absolute control of thought, speech and action."(11)
Although these deeper devilish aims and aspirations underlie the concerted Covidic explosion of irrationality, one need not be consciously invested in sinister goals to aid and abet them. At national levels the well-meaning ranks of the parallel conspiratio have shored up the politicisation of the pandemic by reacting to far more prosaic factors and "events." As we shall see, Boris Johnson's policy U-turn in March 2020 is a case study of the type.
To conclude next month.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) Cf. CO October 2018 and June-July 2018.
(2) Financial guru Catherine Austin-Fitts more fundamentally and expertly describes it as an economic "takedown"; an "engineered war", the "marketing plan" for which is Covid-19: "the magic virus" to which all blame for all aspects of the "reset" can be attributed. In a lengthy online audio interview with Michael Moore of True Pundit, Miss Fitts pinpoints 22 August 2019 as the start of this epic criminal scam. On that day, the G7 central bankers attended their annual meeting in Jackson Hole, Missouri. There, they approved a plan called the Going Direct Reset which was eagerly touted by then-Bank of England governor Mark Carney and others. A massive U.S. Federal Reserve programme of quantitative easing (printing of money) followed in December 2019. This, Fitts explained, "provided the cash flow to do a variety of things, but I would describe what they did to the economy as a takedown: you basically collapse the economy. Their basic goal was to aggregate all the incoming cash flows into their publicly traded companies, and shut down Main Street. It's basically an economic war on the independent producer, and it's also an economic war on all the people you've promised retirements to, because you don't want it [to appear] that you've stolen all their money. So this is a reset, and it's designed to dramatically further centralised control and concentrate the cash flows in the credit, and basically destroy any remaining power of the independent producer to insist on the democratic rule of the public system. And it's engineered. It's a war." But since you can't wreak that havoc openly, she said, "you need a way to market your plan. And Covid-19's the marketing plan."
(3) See CO, October 2020. As of 11/4/21, the Great Barrington signatures stood at: 42,519 medical practitioners; 13,985 medical and public health scientists; and 778,427 concerned citizens. (Total signatories per country include: 163,971 UK; 142,303 Germany; 211,722 USA; 7,137 Ireland; 11,565 Australia.)
(4) Based on the highest concentration of infections at the beginning, the latest findings of the Wuhan Wuchang District Health Bureau place the origins of the outbreak in a residential area located between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Biological Preparations Institute of the China Biology Technology Group Corporation. Both entities have been associated with China’s biological warfare program and the two collaborated on vaccine development just last year. Using that Health Bureau's observations as well as statistics published by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, the highest concentration of reported infections occurred in that residential area and NOT the now-discredited seafood market. [Infowars, 24/3/21]
(5) The anthrax letter attacks, which killed five people, were carried out in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 in order to stoke the "terrorist" fear needed to launch the Middle-Eastern wars long planned by the Zionist Neocons. Predictably, it turned out to be a classic false flag operation overseen by the CIA and FBI, who framed and destroyed the lives of innocent men in the process, one of whom was driven to suicide.
(6) The president of the Spanish Society of Virology announced that a Barcelona sewage sample of 12 March 2019 showed "the levels of SARS-CoV-2 were low but were positive." Tom Jefferson, honorary senior research fellow at Oxford's Centre for Evidence Based Medicine confirmed that many viruses are known to lie dormant in the environment for long periods before suddenly becoming capable of causing dangerous outbreaks.
(7) A fatal neurodegenerative disease caused by transmissible misfolding proteins, it has been cited in numerous mainstream studies published over several years, including a recent one titled: "Covid-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease." -J. Bart Classen, 12 March 2021, ISSN 2639-9458.
(8) A prime motivation to overstate U.S. Covid numbers, each patient actually or allegedly infected with Covid-19 earns a hospital between $13,000 to 40,000, depending on whether or not they reach the (lethal) ventilator stage. In some states amounts have reached $300,000+ per person. In a harrowing account, a New York nurse produced concrete proof of her hospital's fraudulent registration of a healthy young man as a Covid patient when they knew he was not infected with the virus. Seeking the maximum payout, they placed him on a ventilator, which killed him.
(9) Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement, by Jeffrey Loffredo and Whitney Webb, Unlimited Hangout, 26/12/20.
(10) https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero?language=en
(11) Already well advanced, this drive towards an Orwellian Ministry of Truth is being furthered by calls for Internet "neutrality." Promoted afresh by the Biden administration, this plea for free and fair internet access and expression is a sham. Patrick M. Wood, the founder/director of American Citizens for Free Speech, clarifies and warns that: "Today's net neutrality... is not about equality. Rather, it is about institutionalising Internet censorship, forcing everyone who disseminates or transmits content to abide by infamous fact-checker rules as leftists determine them.... If your blog or journal publishes something that the government declares is false, you are going to be punished for it.".