August-September 2024

Zionism Unleashed: 2

~ False Friends ~

THE EDITOR

“For us, the Soviet Union is the fortress of world socialism,
it is our second homeland, the socialist one.”

-Yaakov Hazan
(Co-founder of Mapam, Israel's Zionist party)

 "Israel is the microcosm and the germ of the City of the future.”

- Kuhn, Loeb & Co.
(Jewish financiers of the Russian Revolution)

 "Zionism is anti-Semitic. Zionism is anti-Jewish.
And the solution? We have to get rid of Zionism."

- Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro

In 1906, a son of committed Zionist parents emigrated from Congress Poland (then part of the Russian Empire) to Palestine. There, David Grün took the Hebrew moniker Ben-Gurion, assumed leadership positions within the Zionist milieu, largely led the fight for an independent Jewish state in Mandatory Palestine, and finally became Israel's first prime minister, also serving as defence minister during his two terms.

A zealot said to have been "nearly obsessed" with Israel obtaining nuclear weapons, Ben-Gurion touted his revolutionary pedigree. "I am a Bolshevik," he boasted by way of flagging the nihilistic nature and terroristic intent of his enterprise: Communist trademarks showcased by his agreement that Haganah and the Irgun (terroristic Jewish militias) should co-operate to fight the British; his acceptance of the plan to carry out the 1946 King David Hotel bombing (summarised later); and the Nakbar, the first brutal wave of ethnic cleansing noted in Part 1. 

Thus rapidly emerged the ruthless modus operandi of the Zionist Project foisted on the hapless and helpless population of Palestine: Muslims, Christians and Jews who until then enjoyed a life of largely peaceful co-existence (well attested by congenial photographs of the time). These were the people whose world Lord Balfour effectively erased with the stroke of a pen; his infamous Declaration of 2 November 1917 brazenly gifting the Zionists "A land without people." As James Perloff alludes in his Truth Is a Lonely Warrior: Unmasking the Forces behind Global Destruction (Refuge Books, 2013), it was a total stitch up:

How did that state begin? Israel received the land from the British, but how did they acquire it?

Historically, Britain never had interests in Palestine.

In 1916, when Britain was facing likely defeat in World War I, leading Zionists intimated they could bring America into the war, provided that Britain would secure the Jewish people a national homeland in Palestine. The British government consented, resulting in the Balfour Declaration, named for its purported author, Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, a 33rd-degree Mason.

Samuel Landman, secretary of the World Zionist Organisation, wrote that:

the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret “gentleman’s” agreement of 1916.(1)

Evil roots

An agreement sealed, it seems, with a dodgy handshake.

For, not only was the one-page Declaration and its foundational lie of an 'empty land' penned by Balfour's allegedly(2) elite Masonic hand, it was then sent to an elite Masonic family: to one Walter Rothschild, no less.

A private banker holding no government position, Walter of course was a member of the notorious clan enriched beyond all measure by the Father of Lies, whose seven deadly sins they have variously deployed for centuries at the service of subversion, chaos, and control.

"Give me control of the economics of a country; and I care not who makes her laws," Walter's founding forebear Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1744-1812) is reported to have said(3) on the way to establishing familial dominion over central banks worldwide, and consequently, over governments. (Assisted by their placemen, of course. Such as former Rothschild banker Emmanuel Macron, who, in line with his master's business model — Divide & Conquer — rabble-roused about civil war should he lose the recent election, inciting the violence that ensued.)

The Rothschilds had been plotting and conniving long before the Nakbar, busily implementing the plan of leading Zionist and Israel orchestrator Theodor Herzl, who wrote in his 1895 diary of the need to "discreetly and circumspectly" "expropriate private property" and "remove the poor." James Perloff writes that: 

Even before the Balfour Declaration, the Rothschilds were purchasing Palestinian land for Jewish settlements. French banker James de Rothschild spent about $50 million; today Israel honours him with his portrait on its 500 shekel note.

The Rothschilds have long been the Establishment’s dominant financial power. They have supported three major goals: world government (League of Nations and UN), revolution (e.g., funding Lenin and Trotsky), and Zionism – the movement to establish the modern state of Israel. Why the last?

Christianity teaches the Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The relationship of Satan to the Antichrist and false prophet (described in the book of Revelation) has been called an unholy trinity – with Satan counterfeiting God the Father, Antichrist a counterfeit Christ, and the false prophet counterfeiting the Holy Spirit.

Contrary to the widely held Christian view, I suggest the modern political state of Israel is not the rebirth of Biblical Israel, but a satanic counterfeit. I stress that I say this in a political context; I do not for a moment deny the sincere faith of many of the professing followers of Judaism now living in Israel.

There is a straight Zionist line from James and Walter Rothschild to the late Jacob Rothschild who, prior to his demise last February, was the chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation responsible for constructing and granting the Knesset government buildings, and the Supreme Court of Israel, which prominently features Masonic and Illuminati symbolism such as the pyramid and all-seeing eye (Shift Frequency, 11/3/19).

Fittingly, an aerial photograph of the Supreme Court building is shown in an article titled "The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem." Published on the website of Jerry Golden, a Messianic Jew living in Israel (www.thegoldenreport.com), one notices the Masonic pyramid on its roof. Entering the building, one walks on an inverted cross — the Masonic tradition of trampling the cross of Christ. One then comes to a painting (also viewable on the website) of Lord Rothschild and Israeli leaders examining an architect’s model of the building.

Little wonder there is a street in Jerusalem named after the Rothshchilds or that Jacob had boasted: "We are the founding family of Israel" — a proud cry of recognition that is hard to recall without also calling to mind the telling photo of Jacob posing with renowned occultist Marina Abramovich before an exceedingly creepy depiction of "Satan Summoning His Demons," a huge and unsettling canvas by painter Thomas Laurence. Easily found online, it is hard to imagine a single photo that captures more plainly and powerfully the Luciferian spirit forever animating the Lords of the Earth in general, and the House of Rothschild in particular.

For anyone possessed of a moral and especially supernatural sense, therefore, this tribal source of the Zionist Project explains a lot about the hellish strife kicked off by Ben-Gurion, and maintained by successive Israeli prime ministers of similar militant socialist pedigree all the way to the current genocidal behaviour. Clearly, there was no hope for peace and mutual co-existence to blossom from such a poisoned tree. The Project was dead on arrival.

Zionists vs anti-Zionists

Disgusted by the foundational injustice, Jewish journalist Arthur Koestler, who famously depicted the Moscow Show Trials of the 1930s in Darkness at Noon,(4) framed it bluntly. In Balfour's letter, he wrote, "one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third." More than that, the country was still part of the Empire of a fourth, namely Turkey, which had controlled Palestine for 400 years. Perloff explains that:

During World War I, the Ottoman Empire was a German ally; on this pretext, the British invaded Palestine, though it had little strategic significance. The famous film Lawrence of Arabia portrayed the exploits of T. E. Lawrence, the British officer who led the Arabs against the Turks. The Arabs were promised Palestine in return for helping Britain defeat the Ottoman Empire. They did not know that, behind their backs, the Balfour Declaration would secretly pledge the land to the Jews.

One reason many Arabs hate modern Israel: they bled for Palestine, but by broken agreements, much of it was given instead to the Jews, few of whom partook in the combat. T. E. Lawrence was so upset by the betrayal that he refused to accept his war medals, changed his name, and attempted to live in anonymity as an RAF airman.(5)

At various times from the 1890s onwards, via frontman Theodore Herzl and tapping the infinite financial resources ever at their disposal, the indefatigable Zionists had tempted the Sultan of Turkey with obscene amounts of money to allow a charter to colonise Palestine.(6) In the wake of Turkey's World War I defeat, preying like vultures on its financially emaciated carcass, they even offered to pay off the entire Turkish war debt. The Sultan remained unmoved. Not only did he know that handing over Jerusalem would spark a bloodbath, he replied that his people had won their Empire with blood, and owned it. "The Jews may spend their millions," he said. "When my Empire is divided, perhaps they will get Palestine for nothing. But only our corpse can be divided. I will never consent to vivisection."(7)

Zionists had to consider alternative locations: Cyprus, Argentina, Mozambique, and the Sinai Peninsula. While they finally convinced Britain of their cause, the initial offer of Uganda did not work out. And so Balfour changed history in a one-page letter to a Rothschild that handed over Palestine, even though it was not his to give.

It is important to recall, however, that in the decades prior to Balfour, Jews had not behaved like a monolithic bloc. They argued fiercely with each other about the need or prudence of a Jewish state.

The Zionists attempted to lower the temperature and downplay their strong statist intentions. Typically, the Lord Rothschild of the day wrote: "I can only again emphasise that we Zionists have no wish for privileges at the expense of other nationalities, but only desire to be allowed to work out our destinies side by side with other nationalities in an autonomous state under the suzerainty of one of the Allied Powers."(8)

This expedient lie fooled only the ignorant and gullible since, clearly, it was always about Zionist "privilege" and supremacy.

Like their fellow backers of wars and revolutions the Rothschilds' long-term Zionist vision was self-serving and sinister. It was encapsulated in statements of revolutionary intent made by Kuhn, Loeb & Co., one of the infamous Jewish firms that joined Anglo-Protestant billionaires in financing Lenin and the Bolsheviks.

During discussions with Comte de Saint-Aulaire, French Ambassador to Britain in the 1920s, about why they financed the Russian Revolution, one of their financiers explained that the Jewish “International” would synthesise Marxism and capitalism and “remake the world” through “riches and revolution”, “purifying the idea of God by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah.” (Geneva versus Peace, Sheed & Ward, 1937, p. 80)

 The financier added:

“… our essential dynamism makes use of the forces of destruction and forces of creation, but uses the first to nourish the second. … Our organisation for revolution is evidenced by destructive Bolshevism and for construction by the League of Nations which is also our work. Bolshevism is the accelerator and the League is the brake on the mechanism of which we supply both the motive force and the guiding power. What is the end? It is already determined by our mission. It is formed of elements scattered throughout the whole world, but cast in the flame of our faith in ourselves. We are a League of Nations which contains the elements of all others. …Israel is the microcosm and the germ of the City of the future.” [pp. 83-84. My bold emphases]

This was the Luciferian conspiracy behind the false assurances dispensed for public consumption by the likes of Rothschild and the President of the English Zionist Federation, Chaim Weizmann. In a letter to the Times,(9)Weizmann also sought to allay fears:  

I can only again emphasise that we Zionists are not demanding in Palestine monopolies or exclusive privileges, nor are they asking that any part of Palestine should he administered by a chartered company to the detriment of others. It always was and remains a cardinal principle of Zionism as a democratic movement that all races and sects in Palestine should enjoy full justice and liberty, and Zionists are confident that the new suzerain whom they hope Palestine will acquire as a result of the war will, in its administration of the country, be guided by the same principle. (Emphasis added)

Dutifully focused on the conversion of the Jews, Pius X was not fooled by such deceitful protestations, or by Theodor Herzl's personal promise to respect the holy places of Christendom in return for Vatican support. The passing of time has only served to highlight his saintly wisdom in not being drawn into the same godless Zionist orbit that godly 'dissident' Jews also avoided. Typically, in June 1917, in Buffalo, New York, the President of the Annual Convention of the Central Conference of American Rabbis added his weight against Jewish nationalism:

I am not here to quarrel with Zionism. Mine is only the intention to declare that we, as rabbis, who are consecrated to the service of the Lord … have no place in a movement in which Jews band together on racial or national grounds, and for a political State or even for a legally-assured Home.(10)

Among much else in his enlightening essay, Behind the Balfour Declaration (https://ihr.org/), from which the preceding quotations are taken, Robert John also records the following additional Jewish critics that the Zionists sought to stifle and marginalise:   

There were critics of the Balfour Declaration, although among the cacophony of many events competing for attention, few but its beneficiaries concentrated on the significance of what was being offered. One was the Jewish leader and statesman Mr. Edwin Montagu, who had no desire that Jews should be regarded as a separate race and a distinct nationality.(11) The other was Lord Curzon, who became Foreign Secretary at the end of October 1918. He prepared a memorandum dated 26 October 1917, on the penultimate and final drafts of the Balfour Declaration and related documents, and circulated it in the Cabinet. It was titled “The Future of Palestine.” Here are some extracts:

I am not concerned to discuss the question in dispute between the Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews. I am only concerned in the more immediately practical questions:

(a) What is the meaning of the phrase “a national home for the Jewish race in Palestine,” and what is the nature of the obligation that we shall assume if we accept this as a principle of British policy?

(b) If such a policy be pursued what are the chances of its successful realisation?

[...]

Now what is the capacity as regards population of Palestine within any reasonable period of time? Under the Turks there is no such place or country as Palestine, because it is divided up between the sanjak of Jerusalem and the vilayets of Syria and Beirut. But let us assume that in speaking of Palestine in the present context we mean the old scriptural Palestine, extending from Dan to Beersheba, i.e., from Banias to Bir es-Sabi… . an area of less than 10,000 square miles. What is to become of the people of this country, assuming the Turk to be expelled, and the inhabitants not to have been exterminated by the war? There are over a half a million of these, Syrian Arabs — a mixed community with Arab, Hebrew, Canaanite, Greek, Egyptian, and possibly Crusaders’ blood. They and their forefathers have occupied the country for the best part of 1,500 years. They own the soil, which belongs either to individual landowners or to village communities. They profess the Mohammadan faith. They will not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the latter. [Emphases added]

These were the people whose existence Balfour erased from the historical record with a stroke of his supposed Masonic pen; the innocent party whose generally peaceful co-existence with Palestinian Jews and Christians was ripped asunder by the same Zionists now concluding 'unfinished business'. On 11 November 2023, Israeli Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Avi Dichter, stated the simple truth of the matter: "We are now actually rolling out the Nakbar of Gaza," he proclaimed with rare yet commendable candour.  

Indeed, trotting out a Nakbar veteran on 11 October to rally the troops served to underline the abiding spirit and intent of Ben-Gurion's Bolshevism, linking past and present.

"Force, force, and more force. Destroy and advance, destroy and advance. Erase them, their families, mothers and children," cried elderly Ezra Yachin, reliving his glory days in Lehi, the Zionist terror group, and his contribution to the original 'cleansing'.

October 'Surprise'? Or Zionist complicity?

Notwithstanding the typical blizzard of Zionist lies, exaggerations and obfuscation that followed the 'surprise' attack of 7 October — e.g., unsubstantiated propagandistic claims of weaponised "systemic rape" and other debunked Israeli claims (see "Exposing the Lies" in our last edition) — the assault was nonetheless horrific: resulting in over 1,000 deaths, accompanied by some other genuine atrocities and the taking of hundreds of hostages. Before listing other similar telling responses to those of Messrs Yachin and Dichter, however, let us briefly underline Israel's contribution to this largely preventable tragedy; a convenient 'shock' that created a longed-for genocidal 'opportunity.'

The New York Times has reviewed a 40-page blueprint of the Hamas plot that the Israeli authorities possessed a year before it happened!

The Times of Israel further reported on 1 December that while the document "did not specify when the attack might happen... it provided a blueprint that Hamas appears to have followed: an initial rocket barrage, efforts to knock out surveillance, and waves of gunmen crossing into Israel by land and air."

Moreover, "when an analyst with the country’s signals intelligence unit warned the group had carried out a training exercise in line with the plan [and that it was "a plan to start a war"], her cautions were dismissed." As were other concerns raised by members of the public despite a situational assessment on 1 October that found a "sharp increase in drills by Nukhba forces," with six Hamas battalions drilling once or twice a week.

As Breaking Point reported on 18 June, "Despite having this intelligence, the IDF did not take action to prevent the attack. Instead, they diverted forces away from the Gaza front, believing that Hamas was not interested in war. This decision has been criticised, with some arguing that the IDF’s inaction led to the devastating consequences of the attack."

You might say. Consider, for example, that even though IDF commanders were instructed to take precautions on the back of the intelligence, permission was given for a last minute change of venue for the drug-fuelled Nova music festival that shifted it into the danger zone, placing the participants in the crosshairs of Hamas: a vast decadent red rag to a raging bull.

Furthermore, on 7 July leading Israel daily Haaretz confirmed the use of the nefarious Hannibal Directive we referenced in Part 1. A diabolical policy that mirrors the ends-justifies-the means mentality of the Jewish rulers of the 'Warsaw ghetto' (as we shall recount), the Directive was revived by Israeli authorities to sanction the cold-blooded murder of Israeli soldiers and civilians captured by Hamas, in order to avoid having to trade large numbers of Palestinians for their return.

Under the Directive, orders were issued to: attack any vehicle that drove towards Gaza; bomb the area indiscriminately with mortar shells and artillery and make it a "kill zone"; and despatch drones to attack the Kibbutz Re'im outpost close to the huge Nova festival.

 Documents and testimonies obtained by Haaretz reveal that the Hannibal operational order was employed at three army facilities infiltrated by Hamas, potentially endangering civilians as well.

"There was crazy hysteria, and decisions started being made without verified information," Haaretz reported. This concurs with stories reported in the immediate aftermath. IDF soldiers revealed that their commander told them to open fire with their tanks on a kibbutz, and despite protesting that there were civilians inside were told that the command didn't care and to do it anyway.

Therefore, although Hamas did kill both IDF soldiers and civilians, the question remains:  how many were killed by the IDF because of the Hannibal Directive and this chain of arrogance and incompetence? Not only is it hard to reconcile with Israel's regular boasts about its unparalleled defence capabilities, it also eerily recalls the oh-so convenient 9/11 massacre constructed upon equally opportune "intelligence failures" (read: subversion by compartmentalised intelligence cells), and its hellish ramifications. 

In the first instance, 9/11, the Mother Of All False Flags, was also used as a pretext to whip up vengeful fury against an innocent people: the Iraqis (whose government had no involvement in 9/11 "whatsoever," as recently reiterated by ex-MI5 chief Elizabeth Manningham-Buller).

Quite apart from using Iraq as a stepping stone to other Middle East conquests (see "Seven Countries in Five Years," CO, Feb. 2024), spiteful payback also loomed large in Zionist considerations.

During a 19 June 2024 interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, Philip Giraldi, explained that the domination of  U.S. national security and foreign policy by American Zionists (who currently occupy around 70% of those senior governmental posts!) saw the hapless Iraqi people attacked "on Israel's behalf because Israel was furious with Saddam for looking after families of arrested Palestinians. A major issue for Israel," said Giraldi, a former CIA officer.

In other words, having used American weapons to bomb an entire Muslim nation back to the Stone Age out of petty revenge, it was a genocidal doddle for Zionists to use the same munitions supplier to level the Gaza strip.

In the second instance and above all else, just as 9/11 became the Deep State platform for launching lucrative "forever wars," so 7 October has provided Israel with a launch pad for wars further afield (for 'national security', of course).

"Lebanon is a target too," said Giraldi. "When Israeli people speak of 'Greater Israel', they're not stopping with Palestine. They are interested in obtaining the water resources of Southern Lebanon. In fact, they fought a war over that in the 1980s. They are also interested in parts of Jordan, to have control of the Jordan River, both banks. They're also interested, according to the same accounts, in invading Egypt, and moving all the way to the Nile River. This is a fantasy to a large extent. But when the real extreme right-wing Israelis speak of 'Greater Israel', that's what they're talking about."

Genocidal roll call

As with 9/11, we can only speculate about possible government complicity in 10/7. We may never know for sure if the very unsurprising attack was effectively waved through. Nonetheless, the maniacal resolve of the Zionists to achieve their ends regardless of the means or the catastrophic fallout is a matter of public record, as we will shortly recount. 

The fact that Hamas is sustained by suitcases bursting with Zionist cash, as related in Part I, speaks to the same wanton mindset. For, in funding Hamas with a view to preventing a peace settlement, they effectively funded the 7 October operation (in the same way that their Neocon comrades were complicit in ISIS atrocities by allowing CIA jihadi 'assets' to become ISIS).

Then, with trademark disregard they put the public in harm's way by signing off on the music festival's last minute change of venue, placing it directly in the line of fire.

Finally, they presented the inevitable massacre as a 'last straw' attack, triggering vengeful post 9/11-style hysterics and the Gaza annihilation they had always craved.

On cue, a cavalcade of Zionist leaders and lackeys like Avi Dichter and Ezra Yachin lowered their duplicitous masks to spew forth the hitherto unmentionable party line from the housetops. Consider this roll call of genocidal intent (my transcriptions from footage of the statements assembled by Secular Talk):

"We are imposing a complete siege on Gaza." (9/10/23) "I have released all the restraints. Everything. Gaza won't return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything." (10/10/23)

- Yoav Gallant, Minister of Defence.

 

"No electricity, no water, just damage."

- Ghassan Alian, Head of COGAT, 10/10/23.

 

"Gaza will become an area where people cannot live."

- Giora Eiland, Former head of NSC, 12/10/23.

 

"It is an entire nation that is responsible."

- Isaac Herzog, President, 13/10/23.

 

"We don't take into account that Hamas is not the enemy but all of Gaza is the enemy. A baby there is an enemy. A first-grader is an enemy. A pregnant woman is an enemy. As many corpses as possible."

- Eliyau Yosian, Middle East expert, 29/10/23.

 

"The word revenge has been used a lot in recent days. I don't call it revenge, I call it justice. I'd flatten Gaza. No sentiments."

- Keti Shitrit, Knesset member for the Likud party, 1/11/23.

 

"I want to hear shells and heavy artillery."

-  Tali Gottlieb, Knesset member for Likud, 16/10/23.

 

"We need to establish a proper Jewish settlement in Gaza in order to ensure a Jewish presence in the long term."

- Bezalel Smotrich, Minister of Finance, 7/11/24.

 

"Encourage emigration and the death penalty for the terrorists."

- Itamar Ben-Gvir, Minister of National Security, 28/11/24.

 

"You [the Gazans] will continue to starve, you will continue to die, your homes will continue to burn."

- Itamar Fleischmann, Journalist & columnist, 10/2/24.

 

"The children of Gaza brought this upon themselves."

- Meirav Ben-Ari, Knesset member for Yesh Atid, 16/10/23.

 

"Don't leave a single stone standing in Gaza. Gaza needs to turn into Dresden. Annihilate Gaza now! Now!"

- Moshe Feighlin, Likud member, former head of Zehut, 10/10/23.

Becoming Amalek

Ben-Gurion would be proud of his Bolshevist brethren. So would Lenin. Especially in light of reports that more bombs have now been dropped on Gazans than on Dresden — a fearsome stat with a commensurate body count of 40,000 and rising.

Before this slaughter, egged on by endless other bloodcurdling cries like those above, we should consider that, in 1950, Israel placed the 1948 Genocide Convention (aka Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide) on its statute books; a Convention that strictly prohibits the public incitement of genocide. Indeed, such incitement in Israel carries the death penalty, at least in theory. Yet this Convention and the ultimate penalty for its contravention is held in such contempt by a lawless Prime Minister that he mocks it with the blasphemous manner of his incitement: posturing as an angel of light.

"This is a struggle between the children of light, and the children of darkness," proclaimed Mr Netanyahu on 16 October. Like the devil quoting Scripture for his own ends, he repeatedly resorted to Old Testament analogies tailored for his all-important Christian Zionist fan club in America. "You must remember," he further stated on 28 October, "what Amalek has done to you, says the Holy Bible." His Zionist army and media puppets immediately took up the scripted refrain. 

"I stick by one religious duty, to wipe off the seed of Amalek! There are no uninvolved civilians!" Israeli soldiers happily chanted while jigging football-fan style.

"I can't go to sleep without watching homes in Gaza being destroyed," salivated Channel 14 host Shimon Rikelin on 11 December. Calling for the destruction of "More, more, more homes, more buildings," he parroted Netanyahu's merciless message: "They need to remember that they are the Amalekites. They need to remember that for a long while."

The background to the biblical point is that the Amalekites, a fierce Bedouin tribe referenced throughout the Old Testament (Exodus, Deuteronomy, Judges, Samuel, Numbers, Chronicles, and Psalm 82), were perhaps the most wicked and certainly the most hated of all Israel's enemies. In Judges 6:1-6, Amalek, and their oppressive Midianite allies to whom God had delivered the Israelites as punishment for having once again done "evil in the sight of the Lord," destroy Israelite farms "even to the entrance of Gaza", inducing a famine.

But God hated Amalek's injustice, especially for having ambushed the Israelites at Rephidim during the Exodus from Egypt (Ex. 17:8-16). "Thus says the Lord of hosts: I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt." He then commanded Saul to "smite Amalec, and utterly destroy all that he hath: spare him not, nor covet any thing that is his: but slay both man and woman, child and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (1 Samuel 15:1–9)

This is biblical music to the ears of Mr Netanyahu and his propagandistic allies; to implacable Ultra-orthodox and irreligious Zionists alike.

Devoid of the knowledge of Christ and His law of love and mercy that fulfilled the law and the prophets, they are frozen in an Old Testament eye-for-an-eye time warp that only the New Testament and the Divine authority and wisdom of the Holy Catholic Church can fully unlock and explain.

Thus, benighted and bereft of understanding, butchering upwards of 15,000 Gazan children (so far) in vengeful return for the murder of three dozen Israeli children (how many by "friendly fire" or the Hannibal Directive?) is easily rationalised and glorified: namely, as the fulfilment of God's order to "smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that he hath," including his children. They are blind to the enlightened Catholic understanding of such Divine commands, as explained in this Douay-Rheims clarification of 1Samuel 15:3:

The great Master of life and death (who cuts off one half of all mankind whilst they are children) has been pleased sometimes to ordain that children should be put to the sword, in detestation of the crimes of their parents, and that they might not live to follow the same wicked ways. But without such ordinance of God it is not allowable, in any wars, how just soever, to kill children.

Just as many traumatised survivors of the Holocaust became de-facto Nazis when they emigrated to Israel (see the Kapos testimony herein), it does not occur to Mr Netanyahu and his unholy chorus that it is not the Palestinians but they themselves whohave become Amalek! And since God abhorred and smote Amalek for his injustice, His punishment of Zionists for their latest and greatest injustice may involve far more than simply rendering Israel a pariah state. It might also presage the eventual collapse and dissolution of Israel itself.

Is that eventuality within the realms of political possibility?

Certainly not in the short term.

The forthcoming re-election of Zionism's "best friend," one D. J. Trump, will guarantee Israel four more coddled years for starters. And yet, the hairsbreadth failure of the Trump assassination attempt underscores the inscrutable designs of Providence, in Whose crosshairs the Zionists have placed themselves and their hapless Israeli constituents by quoting sacred Scripture for genocidal ends; a provocation guaranteed to increase His wrath to breaking point, since "God is not mocked. For what things a man shall sow, those also shall he reap." (Gal. 6:7-8) If the Gaza blitzkrieg extends to a provocation of Lebanon and its Hezbollah paramilitaries, the reaping of Zionist sins could indeed be biblical.

During a recent interview, renowned geopolitical analyst Scott Ritter, a former US military and UN inspector, explained that: "The Israeli Defence Force acknowledges that it can't beat Hamas. Hamas is an ideology, you can't defeat it. You can't defeat Hezbollah. Not only is it an ideology, it's also backed by a military that in many ways is much more professional and much more prepared for the future conflict than the Israeli Defence Forces." He elaborated:

Biden knows one thing only, at least his administration knows one thing. That if Israel goes into a full-scale war with Hezbollah, Israel is probably going to be destroyed. That it's the end of Israel. Israel can't survive that fight. Hezbollah has the ability to blanket Israel with accurate, long-range missiles from head to toe, left to right, that Israel can't shoot down. Moreover, if Israel aggressively strikes Lebanon, in an effort to knock Hezbollah out of the fight, Iran will join the fight, and again, Israel is not ready to deal with that.

This becomes a war of existential survival for Israel. Immediate existential survival. I mean Israel's already in an existential struggle in the long term because Israel's become an unsustainable concept of a nation. It just can't function viably over time now, because of what it's done, and how it's positioned in the world. If they attack Hezbollah and invade Lebanon, this will accelerate the process of Israel's demise.... The Israeli Defence Force knows that if they go to war against Hezbollah, that they will lose that war. They know this. But here's the real problem: to challenge Netanyahu could create the conditions for a civil war in Israel. [...]

Even before the Hamas conflict, remember, there was already significant domestic unrest against Netanyahu... which put hundreds of thousands of Israelis in the streets. And it got to the point where the president of Israel said that there's a real risk that Israel will fall into civil war. Not civil conflict, not civil unrest, but civil war. Well, if you had the potential for civil war prior to October 7th, you have the potential for civil war today.       

(Dialogue Works, 5/7/24. My transcript; original emphases)

Flimsy façade

If civil war has not yet set in, civil unrest is already rife. Typical of the myriad tensions surfacing in Israel are scenes of Ultra-orthodox Jews, a key Netanyahu constituency, being viciously attacked on Israeli streets for their refusal to adhere to a recent Supreme Court judgment that they too must fight in the war. This sort of social strife is very far from the face of Israel crafted for the world. As James Perloff observes:

We typically view Israel as the underdog of the Middle East. Here’s this tiny country, surrounded by hostile states, that somehow survives. But Israel is no more an underdog than six men, armed with submachine guns, would be if they invaded a wedding banquet.  [...] Israel has about 4,000 tanks and 400 combat aircraft. When did you last hear of Palestinians piloting tanks or warplanes? The U.S. media consistently play up stories of suicide bombers crossing into Israel, but never mention that the unarmed Palestinians have few other means of fighting back against Israel’s state-of-the-art weapons, funded by American taxpayers. Since 1976, Israel has been the single largest recipient of U.S. military aid, currently about $3 billion annually. [...] President Bush cited Iraq and then Iran for violating UN regulations and refusing UN weapons inspections. But Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and refuses to let the UN inspect them. The American government looks the other way.

[...] 'That’s OK, Jim, because Arabs are bad guys and our terrorist enemies, whereas Israelis are good guys and our peace-loving friends.' That’s how the media have stereotyped them. I submit that the reality is different.

Perloff cites Jack Bernstein, an American Jew who lived in Israel and later related the stark truth behind the facade:

Tourism is one of Israel's main sources of income. The largest group of visitors are American Jews. But, there are also many American Christians who want to visit the holy shrines and to see the land of “God's Chosen People.” These Christians come away very impressed and filled with religious fervour.

While in Israel, Jews and Gentiles alike are carefully watched so that they do not stray and happen to see the sordid side of Israel – the true Israel. Like in Soviet Russia and other communist countries, visitors to Israel are taken on carefully planned guided tours. They are shown the religious sites, the universities, the lush orchards, the technical accomplishments, the arts, and to stir sympathy, they are taken to visit the Holocaust Museum.

But, kept from the eyes of the tourists are the ghettos, the prisons where political prisoners, mostly Arabs and Sephardic Jews, are subjected to the most inhumane forms of torture. The tourists do not see the widespread crime activities and the corruption and cooperation between organised crime bosses and government and police officials. The tourists do not learn of the true inner workings of Israel's Marxist/Fascist government; nor do they see Israel's racism.

I met one American tourist who couldn't help telling me about the wonderful religious feeling she had from being in Israel – the Holy Land. I remarked to her, “Just try giving a Bible to a local Jew and you will see how much religion and religious freedom there is in Israel. If seen by the police, you will be arrested.” - The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel (1985)

Increasingly, Israelis themselves are coming to realise that all is not what it seemed.

Though raised as a Zionist, following his brother's death, which triggered a drastic reappraisal of his own life, Jewish Arab Alon Mizrahi awakened to the blanket of propaganda and lies that had smothered and distorted his life and worldview. Now a major Zionist critic, the left-wing writer and bloggerbelieves Israel is headed for "national suicide." During a 5 July interview with American Jewish podcast Useful Idiots he explained his 'escape' from the Israeli echo chamber, leading to a drastic change of heart and understanding once he realised that:

Zionism is is 100% fiction. There's not one grain of truth to all of it. The version of history it tells people, the version of what happened, how people came here, and who came here, and what they did, what kind of relationships they had with the Zionists, or the Turks, the British — everything about it is just one big lie. It's unbelievable. The more you read and you learn and discover another layer and another layer of another and another fiction. It's really like this for me and I've been... deprogramming, or unlearning, my Israeli, or even Jewish identity.

[...] I think that Zionism, from the very second it was born, began as a very narcissistic and demonising ideological movement. Because what does it mean, I'm going to move millions of people from here to there, and tell them this is your story? What about other people who live there? What is this? This is playing monopoly with people, not caring at all about what's going to happen with them, about what it's going to look like, what kind of brutality you are going to have to carry out to allow this to happen.

I think we are not, I mean other Jews who are part of this, like, critical voice, I'm not sure we are even radical enough in the way we define and conceptualise Zionism, and how evil it is, and how evil it has become. I think maybe we are still a little bit gentle with this movement.

(My transcript; original emphases.)

Judaism 

Mizrahi then addressed the heart of Jewish woes: bravely broadening his critique to include a searing indictment of his own religion and its "toxic" promotion of Jewish superiority and separateness.

Also held by the Zionist founders of Israel, this worldview constitutes, somewhat paradoxically, the religious raison d'être of their secular state. Hence Israel's special appeal to Mr Netanyahu's extreme Ultra-orthodox supporters who espouse Talmudic Jewish supremacy — none more so than his late friend Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, whom Netanyahu called "the most influential man of our time."

The same supremacist outlook cynically exploits genuine Jewish suffering via the Holocaust Industry. A socio-political weapon and cash cow, the 'Industry' also keeps Jewish people in the state of perpetual fear and control described here by Mizrahi:

If we were courageous, we need to look at Judaism, not only at Zionism, because [of] this story that we've all been told, that everybody hates us, and wants to kill us, and [about Jewish] exceptionalism, conformity and survival, so tied together in Judaism and in Zionism. You're exceptional, you're unlike everybody else... you don't marry other people, you only intermingle with them to a degree, you're not one of them. For Jews in the U.S. it doesn't tally, it doesn't make sense. But I think there's a growing paranoia now.

But the sense of exceptionalism, that we're not like other people, we are different from the rest of humanity, and we have to, somehow, barely survive this never-ending attack against us — and we can only survive through conformity, through staying within the tribe, accepting all its beliefs, and all its stories — this is so toxic, for your consciousness, for how you see life. I mean how can you look at people normally, and look at world events normally, when this is what you have in mind; that you are not like other people?

This whole narcissistic way of seeing things, like, we only suffer, this is only about our pain, This is such BS. And so we are creating, politically, Zionism. Judaism could've gone in different directions, it could've become more open, more involved with other people, more accepting of other people, and other religions. But Zionism made everything so closed-up  and singular. And now we can only be a good Jew if you're identifying with Zionism and accept its tenets, and you accept the killing of women and children, if you lose all morality and all humanity. Now there's only one way to be a Jew, [repeats] only one way to be a Jew, through trauma, and brutality, and war, and all this insanity. 

The real Israel

Interviewed by TRT World on 26 May, Max Blumenthal of the liberal-left Gray Zone also addressed whether there is a disconnect or an alignment between Israeli society and Israeli leadership, providing further important insights (my transcript; original emphases):

My book Goliath was really my attempt to convey to Americans the reality of Jewish-Israeli society. Which is not that there is a difference politically between the Israeli people and this psychotic right-wing leadership. But that the more right wing, the more [Talmudically] theocratic, the more genocidal the leadership becomes, the more reflective it is of the essence of Jewish-Israeli society under the system of Zionism at this stage.

And I tried to immerse readers into the world that I existed in over the course of five years going in and out of the heart of Jewish-Israeli society, and seeing the various systems of indoctrination, that ensure this militarised mindset of children as soon as they are conscious, all the way through their military service, exploiting everything from the Holocaust to various intifadas to instill this culture of fear and loathing of Palestinians and people, not just on the other side of the wall, but the people who might share a classroom with them at Haifa University. And also to show what it was like for Palestinian citizens of Israel under that system. That's something that wasn't really spoken about.

So this also made me believe that Israel was on its way toward committing genocide. What I took away from project, writing the book Alive, was that Israel's destiny, as expressed by a majority of its population, was to finish 1948. 

You know, you can be in Tel Aviv and meet some liberal Israelis or leftist Israelis who might have another vision, and I spent a lot of time with the very marginalised anti-Zionist Jewish Israelis, who in many ways were my guides to Israel. But I also got to be on base with Israeli soldiers in the West Bank and talk to them. And they come from the communities that represent the true working class, Jewish-Israeli working class, who are kind of ignored in their own ways, and have faced their own level of violence from the Israeli police. And what they say simply is, 'You know, our lives are hard here. It would be a lot easier if someone could just push the button and eliminate the Palestinians. We don't care.'

That's where [Minister of National Security] Ben-Gvir comes from. That's where [Minister of Finance] Bezalel Smotrich comes from. That's where, in many ways, Netanyahu comes from, but he balances that reality, the genocidal impulse that has emanated from the Zionist indoctrination system, he balances that with the Americans who he has to cater to and manipulate. And Netanyahu is such a special figure in that regard, because, you know, throughout the 90s he was mostly here in Washington, hanging out at AIPAC's [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] offices right down on K Street. He grew up in suburban Philadelphia. His father spent most of his life in upstate New York. Netanyahu is as much a product of this society as he is of that [Israeli one],  and he's the last figure who can balance those two interests. Once Netanyahu leaves the stage, it's going to be those guys on the military base, and Americans need to recognise, that's the real Israel that they're going to have to contend with, which has nuclear power, which has the capacity to commit genocide, and is doing it right before our eyes and live-streaming it, shamelessly.         

Dehumanising thread

All of this speaks to the common theme of dehumanisation now playing out at every level of Western life, to which Israeli and American Zionists have contributed so greatly and terribly.

Simply consider the American politicians we noted in Part 1, who airily call for the annihilation of Gaza, while studiously ignoring the complex, nuanced, and sometimes contradictory perspectives the Palestinians hold about Hamas after decades of suffering and desperation. "The trauma is profound. And they'll tell you two conflicting ideas in the same breath. On the one hand, they're angry. And sometimes some people will blame Hamas, but everybody knows who's bombing them. Everybody," commented Palestinian-American novelist and author Susan Abulhawa who has twice travelled to Gaza since the siege.

Self-serving agitators masquerading as politicians, US 'leaders' and their Western counterparts personify the latest seamless thread in Satan's all-out war against the objects of his eternal hatred: human souls made in the image and likeness of the God Who cast him and his rebellious angelic hordes out of heaven. In Threading the Needles: The Escalation of Inhumanity (Oct. 2021) I traced the eugenic escalation of the bio-fascist arm of this asymmetric war back to the banalisation of baby-killing in utero:

which hardened hearts, coarsened minds and spilled over inexorably into Mengele-esque embryo experimentation, euthanasia, etc. At the same time, the rise of a political psychopathy viewing liberty, the rule of law and human life itself as wholly expendable in pursuit of globalist agendas has also taken its toll. In the process, the mass murder and human misery dismissed as mere "collateral damage" in the "war on terror" has prepared the populace to shrug off "collateral damage" in the 'war on viruses.'

Whether the war against unborn life, the deliberately undefinable "war on terror" or the cataclysmic post-9/11 "forever wars" it engendered, Zionist fingerprints are all over this litany of strife that increasingly defines modern life.

It owes much to Zionist flag-wavers like Michael Ledeen (referenced in Part 1) and the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit he personifies and extols — viz., the "whirlwind of energy" that fuels their boastful quest for "creative destruction" (a truly demonic phrase). The godless Zionist force behind the post-9/11 proxy-wars savagely perpetrated by America on Israel's behalf was the same alien spirit that embraced and imposed the experimental gene-therapy jabs with such naked aggression that Pfizer called Israel its living "laboratory."

The current Gaza abomination has again placed on public display the deadening effect of this propagandistic Zionism on Israeli hearts, minds and souls. Responding to the concern of his Jewish interviewer (also raised as a Zionist) that "All these deaths of Palestinians at the hands of Israel since October 7th, it doesn't seem to have stirred many people inside Israel to do anything," Alon Mizrahi explained that:

Israelis still feel [they are] the victims in this. Like absolutely 100% of victims in Palestine are Israel or Israelis, and Jews. There is no room, there's no space, there's no hypothetic possibility to consider Palestinian victimhood. It doesn't exist, at all. And what happened to Israeli society will need to be studied and will be studied I think for many decades. I don't think this is something the world has ever seen. A society that has become so corrupt, and I mean so wildly, in a way that is so amazingly detached from reality, like, completely. I don't know how you can have a conversation with people who have these kinds of beliefs.... People who think they are the victims, and people who think they are 100% right and righteous, what can you say? What can you say to them?

This deluded sense of victimhood is a modern extension of the Christophobia instilled in Jews since time immemorial and cemented by the Nazi purge: for which anti-Semitic holocaust Christians were held responsible and were thus to be feared and detested.

In the 2009 documentary "Defamation", Israeli director Yoav Shamir embarks on an international quest to discover if "anti-Semitism" actually exists outside the claustrophobic Israeli bubble: Does it remain a dangerous and immediate threat? Or is it a scare tactic used by Zionists to discredit their critics? Emphatically, the answers prove to be "No" and "Yes" respectively.

But the scare tactic is used not just to discredit critics of Zionism. Filling people with irrational fear is a major control mechanism, as Shamir discovered while accompanying young Jews on a school trip to Auschwitz. Cowed and emasculated by the "anti-Semitic" propaganda spewed by their Zionist handlers, the children would not even venture forth from their lodgings for fear of being attacked by Christian Poles!   

So, if it's not the Palestinians it's the Christians or some other bogeyman. Any contrived threat will do to unite the tribe in fear and loathing. The terrible cost of which is the bestial mindset that one may view in full technicolor: in videos of Israeli soldiers casually smoking on rooftops as they watch bombs rain down on the helpless residents of Rafah below, then turning to give a hearty smile and thumbs up to the camera as massive plumes of smoke behind them signal yet another mass grave of dead, dismembered and lost Palestinians: the latter buried beneath the rubble, hoping and praying to be found before they are crushed or suffocate to death.

Social media posts also show young Israelis rejoicing and laughing about the death and destruction of their neighbours, whom they consider less than human. "Cockroaches" is their common appellation for Gazans, and 'Kill every last one of the cockroaches' is the gist of the common theme. The following recollection speaks directly to this tragic distortion of the hearts and minds of Israeli youth (—one of thousands of comments posted in November 2023 beneath Gideon Levi's address transcribed herein):

I am East Asian and visited Israel for a month in college. I was there to teach engineering concepts to highschoolers. They often asked me what I thought of Palestine, and I'd tell them "You know, as a guest in your country, I'm learning a lot and I don't think I know enough to say," to try and be polite. These children would then gleefully tell me how much they hated the Palestinians, how they were like cockroaches. One child even compared them to the mindless giants in "Attack on Titan" and that they needed to be exterminated. Later that day, a child asked me about my country, Japan, and pulled back his eyes to do the racist "squinty" face. I got a little upset, and asked him how he would like it if I made a sign of a big nose while asking about Jewish people. He got very mad at me.

I have never been more terrified of, and sorry for, a group of children in my life.

"Pithumans"

Very happily, one can juxtapose this degradation with the humanity and compassion of many anti-Zionist Israelis shocked and disgusted by it all, to include Israeli army veterans and Holocaust survivors. Nonetheless, their mentality and response contrasts starkly with the majority view of their compatriots, whose brutalisation was further personified by the Israeli settlers who blocked and destroyed humanitarian aid trucks en route to Gaza on 13 May, as besieged Gazans were literally starving to death.

Showing footage of the barbaric scene on his podcast — settlers pulling food and supplies from the trucks in front of complicit Israeli police, ripping them open and ruining and scattering contents — liberal comedian Jimmy Dore said, "It's like a new breed of human. They're not pitbulls, they're pithumans. You can't leave them near your children." He went on to school his vast online audience (my transcript; his emphases):

If you could think of a recipe, to create anti-semitism, do you think you could think of a better recipe? Showing a bunch of guys in yarmulkes destroying aid to a country you're bombing, slaughtering its children, and women? Could you think of a better recipe? I can't think of a better recipe. This is monster Nazi stuff. That's what you would think the Nazis would do to Jews in World War Two. No, that's what Jews are doing to citizens. Women and children, babies. That's what they're doing. Destroying aid.

This is Zionism. And the people who are Zionists want you to conflate Zionism with Judaism. So then they can call it anti-semitism, if you're against Zionism. I'm against Zionism. I'm against Zionists. Zionism is evil... it's based on stealing someone else's land. And that's not for the Jews who lived there. It's for the Jews who came from Europe. Zionists are European. And lots of Jews are against this.

You wonder why the whole world has turned against Israel.

This is not going to end well for Israel. It already hasn't.

Such demented behaviour is routine for the Israeli settlers, whose ever burgeoning presence in the West Bank is tailored to circumvent peace plans, as admitted by Mr Netanyahu himself in the leaked video related in Part I. Their arrogance and raging violence is captured in EXPOSED: Israel's Secret War,(12) a documentary published on 17 May by Double Down News, which shows these self-entitled creatures robbing and assaulting Palestinians, and destroying their property, with impunity.

Before this workaday terror the Zionist attempt to sway world opinion by demonising Palestinians and Hamas is a bit rich. They only get away with it because they control the storyline. The infowar, like the physical war, is not a fair fight.

Susan Abulhawa, the aforementioned Palestinian-American author, charged that the Israeli and U.S. governments launched a coordinated propaganda campaign in the immediate aftermath of 7 October (reportedly splashing $8.6 million between October and May) aimed at dehumanising Palestinians, successfully crafting a false narrative of Hamas fighters as bestial monsters who killed for the sake of killing.

She cited the volume of horror stories of sadistic crimes allegedly committed by Hamas fighters, including the beheading of babies, which have been promoted by Israeli and U.S. officials, including Biden, only to later be disproven under scrutiny from journalists and independent researchers. "They said that they beheaded babies, that they eviscerated a pregnant woman, that they burned a baby in an oven, like really horrific violence that seemed just evil and gratuitous to kill Jews. That was the narrative," she said. "It had not even a seed of truth."

Historical pattern

The Israeli settlers are merely the latest product of the dehumanisation process. It commenced in the aftermath of the war, when notable Jews were denounced for warning of the danger of victims mimicking their oppressors. In his Preface to Modernity and the Holocaust (Polity Press, 1989), a study by no means anti-Israel, anti-Zionist or anti-Jewish, Zygmunt Bauman writes that the celebrated German-Jewish historian and philosopher Hannah Arendt (who famously coined "the banality of evil") was "shouted down by the chorus of offended feelings when she suggested that the victims of an inhuman regime might have lost some of their humanity on the road to perdition." As if speaking to the Holocaust Industry that runs Israel, Bauman also considers that:

"The Jewish state tried to employ the tragic memories as the certificate of its political legitimacy, a safe-conduct pass for its past and future policies, and above all as the advance payment for the injustices it might itself commit."

That of course is just another way of saying what Golda Meir reportedly said: namely, "After the Holocaust, we can do whatever we want" — which they have done ever since, and are doing
right now.

To aid their cause the Zionists not only dismissed the concerns of Hannah Arendt and others, but also adopted a post-war policy of hiding the complicity of many Jews who eagerly assisted the Nazis to oppress and kill their own people, never holding them to account.

The Jewish leaders and police of the so-called 'Warsaw ghetto' are prime examples.

Actually a self-contained community ruled and administered by Polish Jews with government agreement, rulers of the 'ghetto' dragged their own people from their homes and threw them into the train carriages bound for the death camps. Some of those who suffered at the hands of their own Jewish brethren recorded their experience. Ichhak Kacenelson, murdered by the Germans in 1944, wrote a poem titled, "Oh my anguish":

I am the one who has seen it, who observed it close-up, / ... I watched it all from my windows; I saw bands of murderers – / ... Death was inflicted by Jewish hands upon the Jews – defenceless Jews! / Traitors, who ran down the empty streets in shiny jackboots, / They marched viciously, and on their hats, instead of swastikas they carried Stars of David / ... They threw us off the stairs; they dragged us from our homes, / ... And they swore; "To hell, move fast, to transportation, this is where your place is!" /... Wagons!.../ Inside them the Jews! / ... Beside them Jewish policemen – cruel and savage thugs! / And on the side – a German with a faint smile is looking on at them, / ... – he doesn't get in the way, / He's inflicting death upon my Jewish people using Jewish hands!(13)

All manner of historical distortions, manipulations and defamations were (and are) used by the Zionist leadership to cover up this tragic truth about their forebears and shift responsibility for the extermination of their people from the Germans to the Poles, so many of whom risked their lives to protect Jews.

The same ends-justify-means strategy (often to extract unjust wartime reparations, as in the Polish case) is used across the board: whatever unspeakable wickedness works for the Zionism is acceptable.

Hence, neither the settlers who blocked and destroyed the life-saving aid for Gaza, nor the police who stood by and egged them on, nor snipers who shoot dead in broad daylight manifestly innocent men, women and children simply going about their daily business — and so much other inhumanity reminiscent of the Warsaw Jewish leadership recounted by Ichhak Kacenelson — will ever be held accountable for their despicable actions.

On the contrary, their merciless efforts will be praised for increasing the suffering and death of Gazans, and those assisting Gazans, including Americans!

False Friends

"American Medical Missions trapped in Gaza, facing death by dehydration as population clings to life," ran an Intercept headline atop a report on approximately 20 American doctors in dire need of the aid wantonly destroyed by the settlers.

The uninformed might be astonished by this ungrateful disregard by the Israelis for the lives of citizens of the very country that sacrifices its soldiers on their behalf, hands them billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars each and every year, supplies them with munitions, and steadfastly protects them from regular bouts of international outrage over their bloody use of those weapons.

But this cold-blooded betrayal of their American ally has been a common feature of their 'alliance'.

Alone, the Chinese Communist-level spying is relentless.

During their aforementioned interview, Judge Napolitano and Philip Giraldi discussed this unspeakable state of affairs [my transcription and bold emphasis; speakers' emphases in italics]:

JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Does Mossad spy on Americans?

PHIL GIRALDI: [Laughing] Yeah, Mossad constantly spies on Americans. I remember my time in the Agency [CIA] where I used to talk to some officers who had served in Israel, and the spying on them was constant, and their quarters were bugged with microphones, their cars were bugged, the spying was constant. They also spy on Congress. A few years ago, the FBI discovered there were a bunch of radio transmitters located in electrical lights, street lights, and that sort of thing, all around Capitol Hill, and near the White House.  These were planted to be able to pick up telephone conversations, and that sort of thing. And that was done by Israel.

JN: Why does the United States tolerate this? Isn't it the job of the FBI to protect us from foreign agents spying on us? 

PG: Well, with the exception of Israel. That's the problem. Israel gets a free pass on almost everything. This FBI investigation [into the bugging operation above] goes back a few years ago. Never went anywhere, as I recall. Although somebody in the FBI slipped up and said, yes, it was Israel that did it. Which was kind of an embarrassment. But it's a given.
Some of the stories that are coming through now about how they're manipulating media and also social services online with fake personas who are spreading stories that are denigrating anybody Israel considers and enemy, and are encouraging good stories to appear about Israel. So this is a major effort, and it's ongoing.

JN: What has Israel done, as a country, for the United States, as a country?

PG: Well it's taken a lot of our money, and spent it. It's used a lot of our weapons to kill Muslims. Apart from that I can't think of too much that Israel has ever done for us.

When I was in the intelligence services there used to be this myth that was propagated by certain Congressmen, and this myth was that Israel was a wonderful source of intelligence information needed by the United States. Whenever I had a chance to talk to people who actually saw the intelligence that was being circulated, as being important coming from Israel, they said it was all fabricated. And I heard that from numerous people in the grapevine, when I was still in the loop. And my answer to you — what has Israel ever done for us? Nothing.

Whether spying maniacally on its ally; selling U.S. technology to the Chinese; compromising, bribing and blackmailing politicians to do their bidding (think Jeffrey Epstein/Robert Maxwell/Mossad – and the unleashing of Pegasus, the most insidious spyware on earth); deliberately bombing a U.S. ship and killing or crippling many of its crew; or going rogue to near apocalyptic effect during a joint US-Israel cyber operation, and on and on — treachery and deception are Israel's middle names.

To be perfectly fair, though, the Zionists never hid these trademark traits. They made it crystal clear from the outset that anyone who cosied up with them would pay the traitorous price if it served their interests. A jaw-dropping summary of major betrayals is provided by James Perloff in Truth Is a Lonely Warrior. The details make the abandonment of the American doctors in Gaza seem trivial in comparison. Famously, Britain was the first to get its just desserts.

King David Hotel

After World War II, the British continued governing Palestine, with their administrative, military and police headquarters in Jerusalem’s King David Hotel. Zionists wanted Britain to exit Palestine so they could proclaim Israel a nation. In 1946, members of Irgun, an Israeli terrorist group, entered the King David dressed as Arabs. They brought in explosives, concealed in milk cans, and blew up the hotel, leaving 91 dead and many others mutilated. This was one of numerous Zionist terrorist acts against the British, who got the message and departed.

The hotel housed the British Army headquarters and the Palestine government offices. The day after the event, Prime Minister Clement Attlee told the House of Commons that, "of all the outrages in Palestine, many and horrible in the last few months," the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, "this insane act of terrorism," was the worst.

USS Liberty

Israel's 1967 attack on the USS Liberty deserves a more detailed account, so as not to leave incredulous readers with any doubt whatsoever about the deliberation involved in this Israeli mass murder of its allies. Also to demonstrate the mutual dehumanisation and treachery facilitated by the US-Israel alliance:

The USS Liberty was an American reconnaissance ship, unarmed except for four 50-caliber machine guns, serving with the U.S. 6th fleet in the Mediterranean. During the 1967 Six Day War between Israel and her Arab neighbours, it was stationed in international waters off the Egyptian coast.

Israel’s air force and navy attempted to sink the Liberty. First their unmarked planes (bearing no Israeli insignia) hammered the ship with rockets, cannons, and napalm. They especially targeted the Liberty’s communication antennas; after destroying these, they sent in torpedo boats to finish the job. Five torpedoes were launched; one struck the ship, which had taken evasive action. In the meantime, Liberty crew members patched together some communications equipment, and got off a message to the 6th fleet that they were under attack.

The aircraft carrier Saratoga replied that warplanes were on the way. The Israelis, apparently having overheard the communications, ceased attacking and fled. However, unknown to both the Liberty and her assailants, U.S. warplanes were not on their way. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara had ordered Rear Admiral Geis, commander of the task force which included the Saratoga, to recall them. As John E. Borne relates in The USS Liberty: Dissenting History vs. Official History:

The first rescue flight was cancelled on direct orders by radio from Secretary of Defense McNamara, who ordered a 90-minute delay before any further flights. When the second flight took off at 1550 (having waited 90 minutes as ordered) Geis notified McNamara, who again ordered the recall of the flights. Any officer who doubts the wisdom of an order he has received has the prerogative to ask that the order be confirmed by a yet-higher officer, and Geis availed himself of that right. Since he was questioning the order of the Secretary of Defense, the only man superior to the Secretary was the President. President Johnson himself came on the radio and ordered Geis to recall the flights because “we are not going to embarrass an ally.”

The attack left 34 Americans dead and 173 wounded. The Israelis announced that they had misidentified the Liberty as an Egyptian transport ship, El-Quseir. This was implausible. The planes made many passes over the ship before commencing the assault. Liberty was approximately twice the size of El-Quseir; its markings were in English, not Arabic; and it flew an American flag. When that flag was shot down, the crew raised a huge ceremonial America flag.

Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chief of Naval Operations and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated:

Despite claims by Israeli intelligence that they confused the Liberty with a small Egyptian transport, the Liberty was conspicuously different from any vessel in the Egyptian navy. It was the most sophisticated intelligence ship in the world in 1967. With its massive radio antennae, including a large satellite dish, it looked like a large lobster and was one of the most easily identifiable ships afloat.

Nevertheless, the United States government rubber-stamped Israel’s explanation. As Liberty survivor Richard Sturman relates:

Disgracefully, before awarding the Congressional Medal of Honor to our Commanding Officer for his heroic deeds our government first asked the government of the State of Israel if they had any objections. The Medal of Honor was then presented in a Washington, D.C. Naval Shipyard by the Secretary of the Navy. Hours later, then-President Lyndon Johnson awarded similar Medals of Honor at the White House with all the pomp and circumstance accorded the recipient of our country's highest award for valor. Furthermore, Captain McGonagle is the only recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor in United States history who has not been accorded White House recognition. So not to embarrass the State of Israel for their attacking the USS Liberty, there is no mention in Captain McGonagle's Medal of Honor Citation or in any Citation awarded the USS Liberty and her crew as to the identity of our attackers. A practice unheard of in American military awards.

Also unprecedented for an attack of this magnitude: Congress never investigated the incident. The Navy’s investigation was limited to one week. The following is excerpted from the 2004 declaration of Ward Boston, Jr., chief counsel to the Naval Court of Inquiry; for the full text see http://www.ussliberty.org/bostondeclaration.pdf.

For more than 30 years, I have remained silent on the topic of USS Liberty. I am a military man and when orders come in from the Secretary of Defense and President of the United States, I follow them.

However, recent attempts to rewrite history compel me to share the truth.

In June of 1967, while serving as a Captain in the Judge Advocate General Corps, Department of the Navy, I was assigned as senior legal counsel for the Navy’s Court of Inquiry into the brutal attack on USS Liberty, which had occurred on June 8th.

The late Admiral Isaac C. Kidd, president of the Court, and I were given only one week to gather evidence for the Navy’s official investigation into the attack, despite the fact that we both had estimated that a proper Court of Inquiry into an attack of this magnitude would take at least six months to conduct. . . .

Despite the short amount of time we were given, we gathered a vast amount of evidence, including hours of heartbreaking testimony from the young survivors.

The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack, which killed 34 American sailors and injured 172 others, was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. Each evening, after hearing testimony all day, we often spoke our private thoughts concerning what we had seen and heard. I recall Admiral Kidd repeatedly referring to the Israeli forces responsible for the attack as “murderous bastards.” It was our shared belief, based on the documentary evidence and testimony we received first hand, that the Israeli attack was planned and deliberate, and could not possibly have been an accident.

I am certain that the Israeli pilots that undertook the attack, as well as their superiors, who had ordered the attack, were well aware that the ship was American.

I saw the flag, which had visibly identified the ship as American, riddled with bullet holes, and heard testimony that made it clear that the Israelis intended there be no survivors.

Not only did the Israelis attack the ship with napalm, gunfire, and missiles, Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned three lifeboats that had been launched in an attempt by the crew to save the most seriously wounded – a war crime. . . .

I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of mistaken identity despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington, D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court’s findings.

Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to put the lid on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

Air Force intelligence analyst Steven Forslund stated in a formal declaration:

On the day of the attack on the Liberty, I read yellow teletype sheets that spewed from the machines in front of me all day. We obtained our input from a variety of sources including the NSA [Natural Security Agency]. The teletypes were raw translations of Israeli air-to-air and air-to-ground communications between jet aircraft and their ground controller. I read page after page of these transcripts that day as it went on and on. The transcripts made specific reference to the efforts to direct the jets to the target which was identified as American numerous times by the ground controller. Upon arrival, the aircraft specifically identified the target and mentioned the American flag she was flying. There were frequent operational transmissions from the pilots to the ground base describing the strafing runs. The ground control began asking about the status of the target and whether it was sinking. They stressed that the target must be sunk and leave no trace.

Perloff then answers the paramount question: Why attack the Liberty? He explains very simply:

This was to be another Maine, another Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, Tonkin Gulf. The plan was to sink the Liberty with no survivors. That’s why the Israelis even machine-gunned the inflatable lifeboats. They flew in unmarked planes because, if successful, the attack would have been blamed on the Arabs. The intention was probably to then bring the U.S. into the Six Day War on Israel’s side, guaranteeing victory.

To this day, the Liberty’s survivors gather annually in Washington in quiet protest. They also maintain a website: www.gtr5.com

The "Trojan" Deception

False flag deceits like the USS Liberty abomination are Zionist signatures, igniting deathly ramifications for everyone except the Zionists. Typically, the "Trojan" communication device was used to deceive America into thinking Libya was responsible for the killing of U.S. servicemen in the 1986 Berlin nightclub bombing. This induced President Reagan to bomb Libya, killing in the process the innocent adopted daughter of the innocent Libyan president. Perloff recaps: 

Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world . . . . As the Mossad had hoped, the transmissions were deciphered by the Americans and construed as ample proof that the Libyans were active sponsors of terrorism. What’s more, the Americans pointed out, Mossad reports confirmed it. . . . Heads of the Mossad were counting on the American promise to retaliate with vengeance against any country that could be proven to support terrorism. The Trojan gave the Americans the proof they needed.

Ultimately, the Americans fell for the Mossad ploy head over heels, dragging the British and the Germans somewhat reluctantly in with them. Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s greatest successes. It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had promised.

9/11

"In the 1946 King David Hotel bombing, the 1967 Liberty incident, and the 1986 Libyan Trojan operation," writes Perloff, "we see a clear pattern to Israeli strategy: deceive America and Britain into thinking Arabs had attacked them." Adding, "And the worst was yet to come," he goes on to deal with the Zionist/Neocon fingerprints plastered all over the 9/11 false flag:

When police detectives try to solve a murder, among the first questions they ask is: Who benefitted from the crime? In 9-11's case, Middle Eastern Muslim extremists did not benefit – the U.S. is making war on them. America did not benefit – we’re suffering the casualties and other costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The true beneficiary is Israel – her enemies were neutralized, courtesy America, with Iran reputedly next on the hit list.

The Iraq war was foreseen before 9-11. Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan.... wrote in 2004:

In 1996, in a strategy paper crafted for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser urged him to “focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power” as an “Israeli strategic objective.” Perle, Feith, Wurmser were all on Bush's foreign policy team on 9-11.

In 1998, eight members of Bush's future team, including Perle, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, wrote President Clinton urging upon him a strategy that “should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein.”

On Jan. 1, 2001, nine months before 9-11, Wurmser called for U.S.-Israeli attacks “to broaden the [Middle East] conflict to strike fatally . . . the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Teheran and Gaza . . . to establish the recognition that fighting with either the United States or Israel is suicidal.”

 “Crises can be opportunities,” added Wurmser.

On Sept. 11, opportunity struck.

"Consider some of the men Buchanan mentioned," notes Perloff:

In 1970, the National Security Agency caught Richard Perle spying on the U.S. for Israel. Unlike Jonathan Pollard, who got life imprisonment for very similar espionage, Perle was not even prosecuted, and allowed to keep working for the U.S. government, ultimately serving as chairman of George W. Bush’s Defense Policy Board.

Douglas Feith, Bush’s Undersecretary of Defense Policy, is an ardent Zionist; the Zionist Organization of America has honored him with its prestigious Louis D. Brandeis award.

Paul Wolfowitz, another Zionist – he spent a year in Israel as a teenager – was Bush’s Deputy Secretary of Defense. He went on to head the World Bank, not an uncommon destination for top government officials after compliantly serving the Establishment.

Perle and Wolfowitz took part in the Project for a New American Century. In September 2000 – one year before 9-11 – it issued a paper entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” which called for an increased U.S. military presence overseas, especially the Middle East. But, it warned: “The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

So we know that, before 9-11, these men wanted to remove Saddam, intimidate other Muslim nations, and bolster Israel; and that they believed a “crisis” or “new Pearl Harbor” would avail these goals.

We know very much else besides: nitty-gritty information that all points a giant finger directly at the Zionists.

"What do they always say about Israel: 'It's our greatest ally'," pondered Candace Owens during a 27 June podcast, before recapping examples of Zionist complicity in 9/11.

For instance, the disturbing failure of two employees of Israeli instant messaging service Odigo to take life-saving action after receiving a message at 7 am (U.S. Eastern time), warning of an attack. The first tower was struck at 8.46 am. Despite having nearly two hours to alert authorities in New York, after scouring the logs for the source of the message the employees alerted Israeli authorities and other Israeli citizens instead. The information was presumably passed on later to the FBI, who have never mentioned it since.

In light of this early warning being passed to Israeli rather than American officials, a Jerusalem Post report of 12 September 2001 holds special interest. It stated that the Israeli Foreign Ministry had received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon at the time of the attacks. How suspicious and miraculous, then, that only four Israelis lost their lives that day. Unlike the thousands of Americans who died unspeakable deaths that could've been avoided if the message had been passed to New York authorities.

In a similar vein of 'prior knowledge', Owens relates the well-known damning story of Larry Silverstein. A good friend of Mr Netanyahu and highly connected politically in Israel, Silverstein seems to be the luckiest person to have ever lived. He purchased the World Trade towers just six weeks prior to 9/11, taking out insurance that covered terror attacks. After the attacks he claimed two instances of terror, since two towers were attacked, and sought double indemnity. He collected $4.5 billion on the towers he had invested in just several weeks earlier. He was even 'luckier' still, since it was his routine to have breakfast meetings at the WTC every morning. But not on 9/11, when he just happened to have an appointment with his dermatologist.

There are many other Zionist links, including the infamous "Dancing Israelis" caught jigging and shouting with joy on a rooftop facing the WTC as the attacks occurred. Tracked down, it was found that they had connections to the Israeli intelligence service. The FBI let them go, with no follow up.   

Stuxnet

Stuxnet was a piece of self-replicating computer malware that the U.S. and Israel unleashed to destroy a key part of an Iranian nuclear facility, and which ultimately spread beyond its intended target with potentially apocalyptic consequences.

In Zero Days,(14) a lengthy 2016 documentary that focused on the top secret Stuxnet operation, various operational and high level national security personnel, along with expert observers, fingered the Israelis for reckless endangerment of the entire world.

The following small sample of extracts from the documentary, transcribed by the present writer, will provide readers with the fearful gist of the vehement accusations, and the total failure of the operation thanks to the Israelis. (Note: The damning commentaries include those of a pixilated female figure playing a National Security Agency [NSA] whistleblower role. Labelled "Anonymous," she explains at the end: "I'm an actor, playing a role, written from the testimony of a small number of people from NSA and CIA. All of whom are angry about the secrecy, but too scared to come forward. Now we're forward. Well, forward leaning.")

ANONYMOUS: "The problem was that Unit 8200, the Israelis, kept pushing us to be more aggressive."

YOSSI MELMAN [co-author, Spies Against Armageddon]: "The Mossad had the role, had the assignment, to deliver the virus. To make sure that Stuxnet would be put in place ... to affect the centrifuges.  Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, was under great pressure from the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to produce results."

ANONYMOUS: ".... we [the Americans] were furious. Israelis took our code for the delivery system, and changed it. Then, on their own, without our agreement, they just f*****g launched it, 2010, around the same time they started killing Iranian scientists. And they f****d- up the code. Instead of hiding, the code started shutting down computers, so naturally people noticed. Because they were in a hurry they opened Pandora's box. They let it out and, it spread, all over the world."

VOICE OVER: "The worm spread quickly. But somehow it remained unseen, until it was identified in Belarus. Soon after, Israeli intelligence confirmed, that it had made its way into the hands of the Russian Federal Security Service, the successor to the KGB. So it happened, that the formula, for a secret cyber weapon designed by the U.S. and Israel, fell into the hands of Russia, and the very country it was meant to attack."

EMAD KIYAEI [Executive Director, American Iranian Council]: "In international law, when some country, or a coalition of countries, targets a nuclear facility, it's an act of war. Please, let's be frank here. If it wasn't Iran, let's say a nuclear facility in the United States was targetted in the same way, the American government would not sit by and let this go."

GENERAL MICHAEL HAYDEN [Director of NSA 1999-2005; Director of CIA 2006-2009]: Interviewer: "Stuxnet, is an attack in peacetime on critical infrastructure." Hayden, throwing up his hands: "Yes it is. Look, when I read about it, right, I go, 'Whoa, this is a big deal.'  Yeah. [...] The people who were running this programme, including Leon Panetta, the Director of the CIA at the time, had to go down into the Situation Room, and face President Obama, and Vice-President Biden, and explain that this programme was, suddenly, on the loose. Vice-President Biden, at one point during this discussion... blamed the Israelis. He said, it must have been the Israelis who made a change in the code that enabled it to get out."

This subversive Israeli action backfired dramatically, producing the opposite result to that intended.

RICHARD A. CLARKE [counter-terroism expert]: "President Obama said to the senior leadership: You told me it wouldn't get out of the network. It did. You told me, the Iranians would never figure out that it was the United States. They did. You told me it would have a huge effect on their nuclear programme. And it didn't."

EMAD KIYAEI: "Iran's number of centrifuges went up exponentially, to twenty thousand, with a stockpile of low-enriched uranium. These are high numbers. Iran's nuclear facilities expanded, with the construction of Fordow [fuel enrichment plant], and other highly protected facilities. So ironically, cyber warfare, assassination of its nuclear scientists, economic sanctions, political isolation, Iran has gone through 'a' to 'x' of  every coercive policy that the U.S., Israel, and those who ally with them have placed on Iran, and they have actually made Iran's nuclear programme more advanced today, than ever before."

Israel's irresponsibility also led to Iran's Cyber Army of computer scientists, programmers software engineers, etc..

EMAD KIYAEI: "If you are a youth, and you see assassination of nuclear scientists, your nuclear facilities are getting attacked, wouldn't you join your national Cyber Army? Well, many did. And that's why today Iran has one of the largest cyber armies in the world. So, whoever initiated this, and is very proud of themselves to see that little dip in Iran's centrifuge numbers, should look back now, and acknowledge, that it was a major mistake."

Consequently, in 2012, Iran sent two sophisticated messages to Israel and America. First by attacking Saudi Aramco, the largest oil company in the world, and wiping out every piece of software, every line of code. Then they did a surge attack on the American Banks, blocking millions of customers from banking online. 

UNIDENTIFIED VOICE: "I don't imagine, I know, people sat around in the White House situation room, and said, 'The Iranians have sent us a message which is essentially, stop attacking us in cyberspace with Stuxnet. We can do it too."

YOSSI MELMAN: "There are unintended consequences of the Stuxnet attack. They wanted to cause confusion and damage to the other side, but then the other side can do the same to you. The monster turned against its creator, and now everyone is in this game."

America's leading role notwithstanding, both the U.S. and the world suffered once again for allying with Zionists.

VOICE OVER: "When Stuxnet infected American computers, the Department of Homeland Security, unaware of the cyber weapons launched by the NSA, devoted enormous resources trying to protect Americans from their own government. We had met the enemy. And it was us."

GEN. HAYDEN [C-SPAN footage of his testimony at an official hearing titled "Protecting Electric Grid from Cyber Attacks"]: "What I said to [The New York Times' national security correspondent] David Sanger was, I understand the difference in destruction is dramatic, but this has the whiff of August 1945. Somebody just used a new weapon. And this weapon will not be put back into the box."

UNIDENTIFIED VOICE: ".... thanks to Mr Snowden, we know that in 2012 President Obama issued an Executive Order that laid out some of the conditions under which cyber weapons can be used. And interestingly, every use of a cyber-weapon requires Presidential sign off. That is only true in the physical world, for nuclear weapons."

ANONYMOUS: "To this day, no one, in the U.S. or Israeli government, has officially acknowledged the existence of a joint operation. [...] I would never compromise ongoing operations in the field. But, we should be able to talk about capability. We can talk about our bunkerbusters. Why not our cyber-weapons? The secrecy of the operation has been blown. Our friends in Israel, took a weapon that we jointly developed, in part to keep Israel from doing something crazy, and then used it on their own in a way that blew the cover of the operation and could've led to war. And we can't talk about that?"

Complicit media

No, apparently not — just as no-one was permitted to talk about the Zionist mass murder of Americans aboard the USS Liberty.

All the while, the master propagandists are left free to whitewash and rationalise their wickedness and never-ending lies: e.g., presenting their Gaza ethnic cleansing-cum-genocide as a biblically-sanctioned response to "40 beheaded babies" (a total fabrication). Indeed, in Zero Days the comment of a senior Mossad operative (his voice and figure disguised) could easily mislead the uninformed and unwary into thinking that Israel is a repository of probity, humility and self-awareness.

"This is a very very dangerous minefield that we are walking," he said in reference to Stuxnet and cyber-warfar, "and nations who decide to take these covert actions, should be taking into consideration all the effects, including the moraleffects. I would say, that this is the price that we have to pay in this war, and our blade of righteousness should be so sharp."

What fierce irony and epic self-delusion! Ideology leaves no room whatsoever for "righteousness." And that being so, the meaning of the word is twisted and perverted the moment it leaves the self-righteous lips of Zionist ideologues.

Yet the complicit corporate press takes them at their word, presenting their self-professed righteousness to a clueless public as gospel truth, without critical examination of the facts. Hence the fierce targetting of those who, after due diligence, reject the official narrative; demonisation that foments societal division that suits the agenda of Israel and its Deep State partners. In his aforementioned TRC interview on 26 May, Max Blumentahl addressed this bedrock propaganda issue (my transcript; original emphases):  

"There's another side to what [the public] is hearing from The New York Times or The Washington Post, whenever an enemy state is targetted. The consequences of regime change in those countries is almost invariably catastrophe, disaster, instability, and the immiseration of most people by design.

We've taken a lot of criticism, we've faced attacks from the same intelligence community that's pumping out these narratives. They've come at us [i.e., Gray Zone reporters] every way short of physical violence, and they continue to come at us. And that informs our understanding of what's happening in the Gaza Strip. Why are people starving in Gaza? Why are the aid trucks not getting in? Why are people being shot trying to get to the aid trucks? It's because this is another regime change project, where Hamas has been declared a terrorist government. The narratives always shift. 'We need to bring in a democratic government.'  And so Hamas police cannot operate in the open, to bring in those aid trucks. And everyone who participated in the civil administration of Gaza is now a target, which means their entire families can be killed, through Israel's Lavender AI targetting system. Simply because they might have been a plumber or worked in the Ministry of Health. And I've been to Gaza and I've met those people. They're completely competent civil administrators, and that entire government is being destroyed, and it's resulting in genocide.

[At the Grayzone] we understand the broader picture, the broader system, which is endorsed by the U.S.. And when you go into the offices here of any media organisation, you're not going to find anyone who opposes the goal of removing Hamas. They don't see anything wrong with that. They don't understand what could possibly be wrong with that. They don't believe that Hamas even enjoys a mass popular base. And that all comes from the culture of the media class in the U.S.. They refuse to understand the other side. 

The media, the legacy and corporate media, based here in Washington and New York, would not be able to function without collusion with the Five Eyes [US/UK/Australia/Canada/New Zealand] intelligence networks, and Western governments. That's who supplies them with so many of their stories. That's how they get their information and get assignments. You have, you know, Scott Pelley at "60 Minutes." When have you ever seen him do a story that did not feel like it was planted by the CIA, or directly dovetail with something that Western intelligence is pushing? In the early 1970s, we learned through Carl Bernstein's investigation about Operation Mockingbird, where the CIA was secretly paying journalists, and they had to incentivise journalists to advance their agenda and propagate stories they wanted to disseminate. Now, it's all out in the open. No-one's trying to hide it.

And it also is not just the US government. It's what we saw after October 7th where the Israeli government was able to plant any bogus atrocity hoax it wanted with the U.S. media. It would go right up on the CNN chyron on primetime. "Forty beheaded babies in Kibbutz Berri were found." And how did they know it? "The prime minister's office confirmed it." That's what CNN's Sarah Seidner said. In what world of journalism is that confirmation — that a political official and especially a master of mendacity like Benjamin Netanyahu's word counts as confirmation? No, you need to corroborate it with actual independent sources on the ground, and they never did. And then by the time they retract it, the damage has been done. That's what consolidated the initial elite support within Congress, and public support among intelligentsia especially, for Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza."

Hamas speaks

Of particular note is the media's sudden disinterest in conversing with 'the enemy.' In the past, it was normal journalistic practice for the press to interview designated bogeymen like Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda operatives, Colonel Gaddafi et. al.. Nowadays, Tucker Carlson interviewing Vladimir Putin is denounced as a monstrous betrayal and danger to the state. The only danger, of course, is the prospect of such interviews exposing simplistic and false narratives being peddled by the presstitutes on behalf of their corporate handlers.

Ditto Hamas. There has been no mainstream attempt to query Hamas leaders directly about their plans, primary motivations and expectations prior to the 7 October attack, and zero interest in gauging how these leaders square their cause and conscience with Israel's summary response and slaughter of their compatriots.

Per usual, it has taken principled reporters operating outside the mainstream to finally undertake this 'controversial' and thankless task. On Drop Site, offering "independent news on politics and war" (dropsitenews.com), readers can find an exclusive report titled, "On the Record with Hamas", wherein "Hamas officials discuss their motivations, political objectives, and the human costs of their armed uprising against Israel." The Drop Site author, independent journalist Jeremy Scahill, explained:

Drop Site conducted a series of interviews with senior Hamas officials alongside a comprehensive review of its statements and those of its leaders. I interviewed a variety of Hamas sources on background for this story and two—Basem Naim and Ghazi Hamad—agreed to speak on the record. I also spoke to a range of knowledgeable Palestinians, Israelis, and international sources in an effort to understand the tactical and political aims of the October 7 attacks. Some people will inevitably criticise the choice to interview and publish Hamas officials’ answers to these questions as propaganda. I believe it is essential that the public understand the perspectives of the individuals and groups who initiated the attack that spurred Israel’s genocidal war—an argument that is seldom permitted outside of simple soundbites.

The highly informative interview is must reading for all those who sense that there is far more to the conflict than the tightly controlled daily narrative would have us believe.

"The past 76 years of Palestinian history have been a nonstop succession of Israeli atrocities and war crimes. Why did Hamas launch such a monumental action at this specific moment?" asks Scahill. "U.S. and Israeli officials often respond to questions about the staggering death toll in Gaza or the mass killing of women and children over the past 9 months by casting blame solely on Hamas. They have treated the events of October 7 as if they granted Israel an open-ended license to kill on an industrial scale. 'None of the suffering would have happened if Hamas hadn’t done what it did on October 7,' is a sentiment Secretary of State Antony Blinken is fond of repeating. That is clearly untrue. But does multi-decade brutality of the Israeli occupation absolve Hamas of all responsibility for the consequences of its actions on October 7?"

Suffice to note here just a few points of particular interest elicited during Jeremy Scahill's interviews, which also include notable Palestinian authors and writers with varying views about Hamas:

• Israel’s social security agency has determined the official death toll from October 7 to be 1,139 people. Among those killed, 695 were categorised as Israeli civilians, along with 71 foreign civilians and 373 members of Israeli security forces. As horrifying as the civilian death toll was on 7 October, the message was and remains firm from U.S. and Israeli officials: Israeli lives are worth exponentially more than those of Palestinians.
• According to Israeli figures, more than 240 people, including Israeli soldiers and civilians as well as foreigners, were taken back to Gaza on 7 October. But the main objective of the operation was to take as many Israeli soldiers as possible to give Hamas negotiating power: not only to obtain the release of thousands of Palestinian women and children imprisoned by Israel, but also combatants, some serving life sentences for killing Israelis (numbering 559 prisoners at the time, whom Israel refuse to release). In the event, due to Israeli complacency and incompetence Hamas captured far more soldiers than they ever imagined possible. Scahill heard from both Hamas and from an Israeli negotiator that four days after the attack Hamas offered to return a large number of civilian hostages to Israel, as they were not equipped to look after them and saw no 'value' in them. Mr Netanyahu refused this offer, stating that he intended to resolve the conflict militarily.
• Apropos the civilian deaths on 7 October and consequently in Gaza, Hamas expected several weeks or months of bombing followed by a prisoner exchange, not a genocidal war. But they believe they had the right to rise up rather than allow Palestinians to die slowly from Israeli tactics and weapons, such as drone strikes, checkpoints, being starved to death and denied medical care.

So, according to the Hamas leadership, Hamas was acting out of existential necessity in the face of sustained diplomatic and military assaults not only on Palestinians in Gaza, but also the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem. "Does the world expect us to be well-behaved victims while we’re getting killed? For us to be slaughtered without making a noise? That’s impossible," said Yahya Sinwar, the Gaza leader of Hamas. Since Israel are occupiers Hamas considers them responsible for the situation, also believing the occupation legitimises their struggle under international law. Notable Palestinians variously defended Hamas' position or blamed them for the ongoing slaughter. Scahill writes:

Throughout the two years leading up to the October 7 attacks, Hamas officials told me, they sent Israel repeated warnings to halt the activity of illegal settlements and annexations in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Hamas also protested Israel’s mounting attacks and provocations on the grounds of Al Aqsa mosque, the holiest Islamic site in Palestine, and demanded that the U.S. and other nations restrain Israel. “We talked to the mediators, especially the United Nations and the Egyptians and the Qataris: ‘Tell Israel to stop this. We will not be able to tolerate more and more,’” said Hamad, a Hebrew speaker with a long history of negotiating with Israeli officials.

“We were preparing because we are under occupation,” said Hamad. “We think that the West Bank and Gaza is one unit. This is our people under oppression, under killing and massacres. We have to save them. And Israel feels that they are above the law. They can do anything. No one can stop them.”

After several decades of this lawless Zionist steamroller, "the West Bank is annexed. Jerusalem is mostly Judaised. Al Aqsa is nearly totally controlled. Gaza is totally separated, isolated and besieged for 17 years, a suffocating siege," said Dr Basem Naim, a senior member of Hamas’s political bureau and a former government minister in Gaza. Echoing the foregoing view of Yahya Sinwar, he went on:

“We have said it before October 7 that the earthquake is coming. And the repercussions of this earthquake will be beyond the borders of Palestine. Does the world expect us to be well-behaved victims while we’re getting killed? For us to be slaughtered without making a noise? That’s impossible.”

• While Israel/Hamas/US talks on a ceasefire were in progress, a belligerent Netanyahu sought to derail them by making inflammatory statements about Israel's steadfast commitment to continue the war to total victory, at a time of Israel's choosing. And this while Hamas was at least open to an incremental or staged settlement that would see an initial exchange of prisoners involving thousands of Palestinians.
• Hamas officials suggested that many of the confirmed dead Israeli civilians were killed in crossfire, "friendly fire" incidents, or intentionally killed by the Israeli Army to prevent them from being taken alive back to Gaza. "If there was any case of targetting civilians," Hamas alleged in its manifesto, it was entirely regrettable and "happened accidentally and in the course of the confrontation with the occupation forces."
• On a tactical level, the 7 October operations exceeded Hamas’s projections. "It was very surprising for us how speed[il]y one of the strongest brigades in the Israel Army [caved in]—the Gaza brigade is one of the strongest, most sophisticated groups of their army—to collapse within hours without any serious resistance, and that even the state as a whole, for hours and maybe days, continued to be paralysed, were not able to respond in the proper professional way," said Naim, the Hamas political bureau member.  "They were able to create this image of [an] undefeated, undefeatable army, undefeatable soldiers, the long hand of Israel, which can hit everywhere or strike everywhere and come back, relax, to drink at some cafe in Tel Aviv, like what they have done in Iraq, in Syria, Lebanon, everywhere. I think it has shown that [Israel’s self-promoted reputation] was not reflecting the reality." The attacks, he said, showed Palestinians and their allies that "Israel is defeatable and liberation of Palestine is a good possibility."
• Mouin Rabbani, a former UN official who worked as a special advisor on Israel-Palestine for the International Crisis Group, agreed that how people in Gaza will ultimately judge Hamas’s responsibility for the apocalyptic devastation they’ve endured remains unpredictable. "I think there will also be many Palestinians who will look and say, ‘Okay, the Gaza Strip has been reduced to rubble. You've left the people of the Gaza Strip defenseless and subject to genocide. And yes, Israel did it. Israel is responsible. But that's on you as well’."

The cleansing rolls on

Meanwhile, the Brookings Institute, a vehicle of the globalist establishment, asked 750 Middle East experts to describe Israeli actions in Gaza:

• 41% said "major war crimes akin to genocide.
• 34% said "genocide."
• 16% said "not akin to genocide, but still major war crimes."

However one frames it the scale of death and destruction tells the story.  On 5 July the Lancet estimated that the direct and indirect death toll could be as high as 186,000 people.

By 19 June, the Gaza Health Ministry had recorded 37,396 deaths since 7 October, as reported by the UN office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Israeli authorities contested the figures yet they were accepted as accurate by Israeli intelligence services, the UN, and WHO, and also supported by independent analyses. Moreover, according to the Lancet, the figures are viewed as very conservative estimates:

"In recent conflicts, such indirect deaths range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths. Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death to the 37,396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186,000 or even more deaths could be attributed to the current conflict in Gaza. Using the 2022 Gaza Strip population estimate of 2,375,259, this would translate to 7-9% of the total population of the Gaza Strip."

This conservative estimate would roughly equate to killing 5 million innocent English civilians! Of course, applying the 4 to 15 range more liberally, say, 8-10 indirect deaths per direct death, would at least double that conservative estimate of the population murdered, to nearly 20% or more.  

It is sobering to reflect that this immense tragedy is now all but buried under coverage of worldwide election dramas and sporting events, as the bodies pile up, and the social and economic damage escalates to unimaginable levels. July headlines relayed the ongoing horrors as Zionists press the pedal to the floor: "Israeli air strike on Gaza school kills at least 16" (BBC); "Thousands of dead bodies still missing under the rubble, with no international action" (EuroMed); "Israel airstrike kills dozens in Gaza refugee camp" (Channel 4 News).

At least 71 Palestinians were reported killed in that refugee camp on 13 July; a day that boasted the highest casualty figures in 9 months of bestial bombardment. The Israelis claim they were targetting two Hamas commanders; terrorists hiding among civilians. Hamas refuted the claim as "false and baseless"; one more excuse from serial liars for targetting civilians. It is a credible charge. An army prepared to kill its own people under the Hannibal Directive is more than capable of targetting enemy civilians under cover of taking out terrorists. Whatever the case, it doesn't help the distressed and tearful woman wandering amid the chaos and devastation of the refugee camp ."My family is gone!" she cried. "Where are my brothers? There's no one left."

The Brookings Institute summarised the broader cataclysm:

In addition to the obvious horrors of tens of thousands of casualties, mostly women and children, according to United Nations estimates, the scale of the devastation of homes and infrastructure is daunting. Regardless of who comes to govern the territory, Gaza has become uninhabitable and nearly its entire population has been displaced. By some UN estimates, it could take 14 years just to clear the rubble and about 80 years to rebuild Gaza to its prewar state, which was already a crowded territory often described by human rights organisations as an "open air" prison. And, less noticed, the West Bank has witnessed escalating settler violence backed by Israel's right-wing government which threatens what little remains of the Palestinian Authority.  [My bold emphasis]

While the settlers are given free rein to up their violence, their handlers, the Israeli military, continue to torture and murder in plain sight:

Red Crescent paramedics on Sunday recovered handcuffed bodies of three aid guards east of Rafah City, after they were executed by the Israeli occupation forces immediately following their release. [Quds News Network tweet, 7/7/24]

Financial/political clout

America, the UK and other Western countries have always covered for this ongoing Israeli terror, when they haven't openly supported it. After decades of cuddling up with their false friends they appear to have osmotically absorbed the cold and calculating Zionist mindset.

As American investigative journalist Ben Swann of truthinmedia.com recently pointed out while discussing the Hannibal Directive: the U.S. has been mimicking Israel foreign policy "for a long time." He also recalled the portentous cry that went up immediately after 9/11: "We've got to be more like Israel" (i.e., in dealing with terrorists).

Max Blumenthal says the ground for this mantra had been prepared by Mr Netanyahu who, following Iran's Islamic revolution, aimed to "internationalise the Israeli understanding of terrorism," which he duly did at international conferences attended by presidents and prime ministers.

Zionist financial and political power also counts greatly, of course. The fact that American Zionists occupy around 70% of senior national security positions in the current administration, as we noted earlier, speaks for itself. As does Biden's top donor, Haim Saban, a Hollywood billionaire with Israeli roots, who says, "I'm a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel."

Biden is now gone but the bipartisan betrayal goes on. Commentator Henry Makow, a self-described "assimilated" American Jew, insists that: "No matter who wins this next election, they will not serve you or work in the best interest of America. They will serve the global Zionist just as they have always done."

At the outset of his candidacy for the 2016 election I suggested that Donald Trump's many and heartily welcomed strengths might all be negated in the long run by his major Achille's heel: his proud and ardent Zionism. "The only [candidate] that's going to give real support to Israel is me," he declared. "The rest of them are all talk, no action. They're politicians. I've been loyal to Israel from the day I was born. My father, Fred Trump, was loyal to Israel before me." Moreover, his daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism in 2008 before marrying Jared Kushner and making the Ultra-orthodox Chabad Lubavitch cult her spiritual home. ["Being Not Hillary: Part 2", CO, Nov. 2016]

A man of his word who kept his election promises, Trump readily satisfied long held Zionist goals: such as moving the American embassy to Jerusalem, and 'gifting' Israel the Golan Heights that they stole from Syria (—shades of the Balfour perfidy). He was pressured by his major donor Sheldon Adelson, the late Las Vegas billionaire who said he regretted joining the US military and wished he could have fought for the Israeli military. So much for America First! He also hoped to see a nuclear weapon dropped on Iran. His wife has taken over his foundation and has contributed over $60 million to the current Trump campaign. She is also the top donor to Neocon pro-war Republicans like Tom Cotton and Marco Rubio.

The Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson foundations work together through the IAC, the Israel-American Committee, which supplements AIPAC as a bastion of bipartisan pro-settler Israeli influence, not just in Washington but nationwide.

Exodus 2.0

The fierce irony at play is that Israel itself is falling apart in the wake of its Gaza onslaught.

Unlike Gazans stuck in a living Hell with nowhere to go, Israelis bearing European and American passports are fleeing their country in droves as disorder and violence mount, and the economy tanks. The following selection of recent headlines about the little country of 7 million suggest that all the money and political power in the world may not be enough to preserve the Zionist dream-cum-nightmare:

"End of Zionism: 2 million Jews Leave Israel" (The CJ Werleman Show, 9/7/24)

"Israel is on the abyss" (Haaretz)

"Over 500,000 Israelis flee country amid Gaza war, data shows" (a figure expected to double and even quadruple as the Hezbollah conflict on the northern border increases)
- TRT World

"80% of Israelis abroad do not intend to return (source: Hebrew University, World Zionist Organisation)" - The Cradle

"28% of Israelis considering leaving the country amid judicial upheaval - poll" - The Times of Israel

"Israel faces massive shortfall of soldiers: Defence Minister says 10,000 soldiers required immediately."

"Bye, the Beloved Country - Why almost 40 percent of Israelis are thinking of Emigrating." - Haaretz

"Bloodshed after bloodshed": Israel fails to bring safety to Jewish people, says rabbi." - AA

"Economy and currency in freefall" - The Times of Israel

"Number of Israeli Businesses filing for Bankruptcy soars by 75%. More than one in three businesses closed since start of year" - i24 News

"McDonalds buys all 225 of Israeli franchise restaurants after boycotts." - Aljazeera

"Israelis are now openly talking about the 'Total Destruction" of the Jewish State" - Rolling Stone

As Rolling Stone put it: in trying to destroy the people of Palestine, Israel has ended up destroying itself.

Critical turning point?

No Israeli contributed more brutally and implacably to that process of destruction than the late Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, for whom any and all means no matter how criminal or bloody were acceptable to achieve Zionist ends.

"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial," he once proclaimed.

And again: "I don't mind if after the job is done you put me in front of a Nuremberg Trial and then jail me for life. Hang me if you want, as a war criminal. What you don't understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it."

Were Sharon alive to today he might not be so cocksure. For, Zionism's exceedingly "dirty" post-October 7 "work" does appear to be finishing. Finishing off, that is, both Zionism and the Zionist state it was meant to preserve. At the same time, the world is now crying out for some kind of reckoning tantamount to putting "the State of Israel on trial" (along with those who enable it, Jewish and otherwise).  

Of all people, it was Sharon himself, however, who perceived the writing on the wall. Years after his bellicose ranting above, he alluded to the inevitability of his country's current existential crisis. In May 2003, to the fury of his Zionist comrades, for whom his words surely screeched like fingernails on a blackboard, this true successor of Ben-Gurion-the-Bolshevist did an about face, daring to voice the "o" word. He freely admitted that Israelis were indeed occupiers, and that their occupation was unsustainable:

"I think the idea that we can continue holding under occupation ... and it is occupation. You might not like the word ... but it's really an occupation. To hold 3.5 million Palestinians under occupation is a bad thing for us and them. This can't continue endlessly."

Nearly a decade after Sharon's death his belated dose of hard-headed reality is still falling on deaf Zionist ears, despite the tragic denouement he presaged now breaking out before us; viz., the occupation he so fiercely maintained being laid bare as unsustainable after a diabolically disproportionate response to a massacre — to which Israel itself contributed in slaughtering its own citizens — squandered the sympathy of the world.

Not that they care about world opinion. That concern summarily ceased the moment global powers lined up to light the touch paper to their incendiary Project: a manifest powder keg that has exploded ever since without repercussions. Until now.   

Israel-Palestine special advisor Mouin Rabbani for one says the attacks of 7 October represent a historic chapter in the cause of Palestinian liberation and compared it to other pivotal moments in anti-colonial struggles in South Africa and Vietnam that came with significant death tolls among civilians.

"There's no denying the catastrophic consequences," he said. "But my sense is that the changes in the longer term — of course without in any way trying to minimise the enormously unbearable damage that has been inflicted on an entire people — will, in the end, be seen as a critical turning point akin to Sharpeville, Soweto, Dien Bien Phu."

Of course, whether it represents a truly substantial turning point depends entirely on the Israeli-controlled Sugar Daddy in Washington. Joined at the hip with the Zionist enterprise, only American complicity and indulgence sustains Israel's impunity, belligerence and treachery; a tragic state of affairs that will surely continue on until such time as the blackmail, bribery and Jewish political clout that keeps America servile to Israeli interests finally peters out. On that score, Sharon, like Netanyahu, held 'Daddy' in total contempt, boasting at various times:

• "I don't care what the American people think, I own the Congress!"
• "I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."

Cycle of self-destruction

This insufferable arrogance is surely rooted in accumulated Israeli knowledge of sexual, political and financial crimes, and their bottomless U.S. election campaign coffers.

American Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatowski recently recounted her personal experience of self-entitled Mossad and military types visiting the Pentagon. There, she said, two sets of rules exist: "One for the Israelis; one for everyone else." Walking around as if they owned the place, friends of high-ranking Neocons like Paul Wolfowitz (Secretary of Defence) "acted as if the Israelis were part of us." 

Even the Jewish New York Times is fed up with Israel's "insane" overreach and self-serving. "American Leaders Should Stop Debasing Themselves to Israel," raged one article in which Thomas L. Friedman railed:

… The Israel we knew is gone, and today’s Israel is in existential danger … Israel is led by a prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who has to stay in power to avoid potentially being sent to prison on corruption charges … Add it all up and you see a reckless act of economic, military and moral overstretch – committing seven million Jews to control more than seven million Palestinians (including two million Israeli Arabs) between the river and the sea in perpetuity. That would be madness in a time of peace. In a time of war – a low-grade three-front war that could become a high-grade three-front war any day – it is insane. Israel is increasingly alone, because what ally would want to partner with that agenda? … For now Israel needs to get the hell out of Gaza and back into a timeout.

Friedman is right. Not surprisingly, though, he doesn't join the historical dots to reveal the fuller and darker truth of the matter. Namely, that it is all redolent of the cyclical episodes of overbearing, self-destructive behaviour of Jewish leadership down the centuries that always redounds to the detriment of the Jewish people. In an article titled, "Anti-Semitism: Why Does It Exist? And Why Does it Persist?", Mark Weber neatly summarises the harsh reality:

Over the centuries, rage and hostility against Jews has repeatedly erupted in terrible violence. Again and again, Jews have been driven out of countries where they’d been living. Why does anti-Semitism exist? And why has furious hostility toward Jews broken out, again and again, in the most varied nations, eras and cultures? … Anti-Semitism is not a mysterious “disease.” As [founding Israeli Zionists] Herzl and Weizmann suggested, and as history shows, what is often called anti-Semitism is the natural and understandable attitude of people toward a minority with particularist loyalties that wields greatly disproportionate power for its own interests, rather than for the common good.

Weber's understanding was amplified by Georg Ratzinger in his tragically prophetic critique published in 1892 by the Vatican-vetted Civilta Cattolica magazine.

A cleric and great uncle of Benedict XVI, he explained in a series of articles how the anti-Semitism of his day (which he deplored) was largely rooted in personal conduct rather than race, nationality or religion (see "Benedict and the Jews: Part 1," CO, Aug-Sept, 2011). Those seeking further concrete evidence of this recurring cycle will find plentiful examples set forth in E. Michael Jones' renowned tome, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: And Its Impact On World History (see backcover advert).

Jewish witness

As we have seen, however, very many Jews and ex-Zionists are now among the leading critics of "insane" Israeli designs. They do not lament the current demise of Israel and will welcome any turning point of the sort perceived by Mouin Roubani.

As we have also noted, there was little enthusiasm for a Jewish state in the first place. Not even the Nazi nightmare stampeded all Jews into Zionist arms. Assimilated in their own countries, many if not most had no wish to uproot their lives to accommodate the plans of a wealthy clique of masons and socialist ideologues.

If decades of Holocaust fearmongering and victimhood-propaganda has proven effective in reversing this indifference and reluctance, by no means has it drawn the entire Jewish diaspora into the Zionist political orbit, never mind to Israel itself to keep it populated and viable. This is why false flag attacks against Jews have always been part of the "dirty" Zionist arsenal. As Ariel Sharon plainly stated, any means are justified to maintain the sacred Zionist state:

Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don’t care.

To that end Sharon and his comrades have always done their coercive best (worst). Yet still, after so many years, the Jewish diaspora remains untamed, insofar as it is not a homogenous Zionist bloc.

So, let us conclude by underlining once again that although very many have succumbed to the propaganda and blindly support Israel, a surprising number of independent minds do not. Like Alon Mizrahi in Israel whose testimony we presented earlier, Jews in America are also deprogramming themselves from a lifetime of Zionist indoctrination. Currently running for congress in a district of Florida in an effort to unseat a notorious Zionist congresswoman, ex-Zionist Jen Perelman recently explained that at a very early age "they got in our brains":

We were taught that Arabs were lesser, that they were dirty, that they were uncivilised, that they wanted to hurt us. We were told that Palestine isn't real, that there's no such thing as Palestinians. And my congresswoman will not say "Palestinian." It will not come out of her mouth. You will never hear the world "Palestinian" coming out of her mouth. Ever. [Secular Talk, 28/6/24]

In a campaign video, Perelman elaborates on her upbringing:

This [photo] is me at 16 years old, in Israel, on a highschool trip, holding an assault rifle, and this, is a definition of indoctrination.

I grew up in North Miami beach. I grew up in a very insulated, very Jewish community. We were taught that Palestine and Palestinians, that's not a real thing. That that was made up by Arabs. Everybody over there that wasn't Jewish was just Arabs. But the message was always clear. That Jews were not safe, and that the Arabs wanted to hurt us.

My relatives, my grandmother, my great grandmother, were raised with this fear mentality. That without the state of Israel, Jews around the world will not be safe.

True history was kept from us. We were propagandised. But as I grew older, I began to see a different reality unfolding. I witnessed the rise of the Israeli lobby, exerting its influence on our politics and policies. I learned of the injustices happening thousands of miles away, in the name of Jewish people. And I can't stay silent in the face of such injustice.

The right to return denied to so many Palestinians. The war fuelled by the Israelis and sanctioned by our own country condemned by the UN and the International Court of Justice as genocide. We cannot turn a blind eye to this injustice any longer.

To me, atonement is really taking accountability for your participation in  something you now realise was not correct, in some way, and wronged people in some way.  I participated in an ethnic cleansing state.  I do not feel powerless, I feel hopeful. It is time for us to use our voices, to stand in solidarity with the oppressed, to demand accountability from our leaders.... For there can be no peace, without true justice.

This is the burgeoning non-conformist mindset detested by the Zionists, who, as freely admitted by Ariel Sharon, resort to all kinds of ruthless conniving and violent subterfuge to herd and/or scare the Diaspora back to Israel and into iron conformity with the Zionist narrative.

Beyond murderous false flag events suggested by Sharon, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir (1983-84; 1986-92) urged the U.S. government to stop granting refugee visas to Soviet Jews, persuading it that they were not refugees because they already had a homeland in Israel, and were only moving to America for economic reasons. Weaponising chutzpah in tried and true Zionist fashion, he also termed the emigration of Soviet Jews to United States rather than to Israel "defection", and called the issuing of US refugee visas to Soviet Jews when Israel was already willing to accept them "an insult to Israel"!

Today's Zionist attack dogs have upped the fear with nuclear-grade chutzpah. The Anti-Defamation League for one now makes the demented claim that "anti-Zionism is genocide"!

But Shamir's outrageous posturing still had its effect. Of the one million Soviets who emigrated to Israel in 1989, how many of the large number of Jews among them would have done so if Shamir had not so wickedly and furtively interfered with their rights and destinies? 

In any event, carpet bombing Gaza to oblivion has only served to awaken the Diaspora's innate sense of justice and swell their dissident ranks. American journalist Aaron Maté and podcaster/writer Katie Halper typify the Gaza effect.

Both raised in America's Zionist milieu, they now host the Useful Idiots podcast, regularly debunking the narrative controlled by fearmongers like LA City councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky, who is frantically calling for taxpayer-funded Zionist militias to patrol allegedly 'endangered' Jewish neighbourhoods.

On a 17 July podcast, Ms Halper commented on video footage at complete odds with Yaroslavsky's party line on Jewish victimhood. It showed people with Israeli flags viciously attacking a male Palestinian supporter, as passive police stood by without lifting a hand to help the distressed victim. While the student protests are a touchy subject, especially as Soros and the usual suspects have funded/orchestrated/incited the pro-Palestinian side, Halper underlined that the man on the video was being attacked "not by pro-Palestinian people but by pro-Israel people." She went on:

And we keep seeing this again and again: the instigators of violent attacks, people with Israeli flags, punching people. The victims are not the Zionists. And of course all these people use the word Jew and Zionist as if they're the same thing. The people who are not safe right now, when we're talking about Jews, are anti-Zionist Jews. Those are the ones who are getting arrested and attacked. And of course Palestinians are as well. But no one pretends to care about Palestinians. They pretend to care about the Jews.

Also, [concerning] the alleged hate speech or racism, or anti-semitism: what we do hear is people calling Palestine supporters the "n" word. We saw [reputedly patriotic] frat boys making monkey gestures in front of an African American woman. The bigotry and racism is coming from one side.           

Aaron Maté drew a comparison between the often false but always heavily one-sided narrative about violent pro-Palestinian protestors, and the ongoing farcical back and forth between America and Israel: the White House regularly and falsely claiming that a ceasefire has been accepted by Israel when Mr Netanyahu is constantly rejecting it. Commented Maté:

Israel supporters claim that it's the other side, Palestinians, that don't support a ceasefire when it's actually Israel that is blocking a ceasefire. The same thing here [in America], Israel supporters claim they're facing violent attacks, persecution, bigotry. But they're the ones meting it out. Across the country, at all the protests. There was nothing more violent than the attacks that happened at the anti-mass murder encampment at UCLA when Zionist hooligans attacked with fireworks and batons. But yet they're the ones that complain that "we're the victims of violence." 

Portentous winds

Ultimately, these awakenings personify portentous winds of change that surely unnerve the Israeli establishment and its agitating Zionist satellites worldwide. The hitherto iron grip on hearts and minds is being prised apart at home and abroad by its own trademark arrogance, violence, and reckless disregard.

We know that they will continue to do whatever it takes, no matter the cost to liberty and life, to maintain that grip. And yet, especially with the rise of social media that records and lays bare what Israel was once able to hide, more and more of their Jewish 'constituents' are aligning with the position of the Neturei Karta (www.nkusa.org). An organisation of Orthodox, Torah-Jews resolutely opposed to Zionism, in the New York Times of 19 April 1972, it typically declared:

Far from being a cause of celebration, the birth of the Zionist state is to be deplored, a state which we know to be conceived in atheism, based on materialism, nurtured by antisemitism, led by Marxism, ruled by chauvinism, trusting in militarism.

What are these but demonic seeds of the Father of Lies: sowing endless strife in the Holy Land, and all over the map.   

 

FOOTNOTES

(1) Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine, (London: New Zionist Press, 1936).
                           
(2) Perloff’s claim of Balfour’s elite Masonry must be qualified, since, despite his otherwise copious footnotes, he does not specify the source of this particular claim. Given the Balfour-Rockefeller link in this sordid affair it is very likely that Balfour wasindeed an 33rd degree Mason. However, an online search merely throws up phrases crafted for plausible deniability (“it is difficult,” “it can be understood,” “potential exposure” etc.). It reveals, for instance, that “Arthur James Balfour, the 1st Earl of Balfour, was associated with Freemasonry”, that “his presence at Thirlestane Castle in 1851 suggests potential exposure to Freemasonic circles at a young age,” but, “In the absence of direct evidence, it is difficult to establish a clear connection between Lord Balfour’s Freemasonry and his political decisions and policies as Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary.”

(3) The Hidden Power Behind Freemasonry, Weisman Pub., 1990, p. 154.

(4) See Darkness at Noon, Christopher Gawley, CO, Jan. 2017. 

(5) Truth is a Lonely Warrior, op. cit., pp. 146-7.

(6) For financial details see Theodor Herzl, Alex Bela, Jewish Palestine Society, pp.262-264.

(7) The Diaries of Theodor Herzl. Lowenthal, p. 176.  

(8) Palestine: The Reality, Jeffries, p. 148.

(9) Ibid., p. 149. 

(10) Ibid., p.153

(11) Memoirs of the Peace Conference, Lloyd George, Vol. II, p. 732.

(12) https://www.doubledown.news/watch/2024/may/17/israel-secret-war

(13) See Jedwabne: An Anatomy of Lies, Ewa Kurek, English trans., CLIO, Lublin 2019. Available at www.multibook.pl

(14) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fqk_VUMzY_M

 

 

CLICK HERE FOR PART I

 

 

Back to Top